Tuesday, 31 March 2026

The Meaning of the Seal of the Prophets (part 3 of 3)

Abú-Jalál

31 March 2026


(7) The Prophetic Cycle inaugurated by Adam

Progressive revelation

‘And we sent none, previous to thee, but men to whom we had revealed ourselves. Ask ye the people who are warned by Scriptures, if ye know it not

We gave them not bodies which could dispense with food: and they were not to live for ever.’ 

- Qur’ān 21:7 – 8 


The Bible and the Qur’ān are agreed that the first Man was named Adam, and that Adam spoke with God, i.e. He was a Prophet. While the Qur’ān does not give a timeframe for when Adam lived, He appears in a sequence of Prophets, followed by Noah. The Bible, through its genealogies, gives a chronology of when Adam would have lived. According to Ussher, Adam was born in 4004 BC, which was based on a backwards calculation from the accession of the Babylonian king Amel-Marduk in 562 BC and an estimate that Christ was born in 5 BC and no later than 4 BC.  The Jewish Anno Mundi calendar starts in a later year, i.e. the year 3761 BC, while the Creation Era of Constantinople begins further back, with Year One being 5509 BC, the difference being that the former is based on the Masoretic text of the Old Testament and the latter on the Septuagint.  Another possibility is that Adam was born circa 3,959 BC, 3954 BC,  3,899 BC or other estimates. In any case, the time period from Adam to the present day is a period of roughly six thousand years. Within that time period, there were at least nine major religions which still exist (e.g. Hinduism, Sabianism, Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Buddhism, Christianity, Islam, and the Bábí and Bahá’í Faiths), and numerous others that are lost to the sands of time (see the chart above). This six-thousand-year period can be called the ‘Prophetic Cycle’ or the ‘Adamic Cycle’, since it began with Adam.  


While traditional Islamic belief holds that Muhammad is the final Prophet and that there can be no Prophet after Him, a different view was taken by Shaykh Ahmad al-Ahsā’ī (1753 - 1826), the founder of the Shaykhi School of Islām. According to Rafati (1979), Shaykhī belief held that ‘a prophetic cycle began with Adam and continued to the Prophet Muḥammad. During this Adamic cycle, six major prophets appeared: Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and Muḥammad.  While most Muslims believe that Muḥammad was the last Prophet, Shaykh Aḥmad maintains that he was the last Prophet only within this cycle… Shaykh Aḥmad’s view of Muḥammad as the final only within the Adamic cycle implies a continuing divine revelation through a succession of prophets in a series of cycles; while each cycle has a beginning and an end, the cyclic process itself is progressive and continuous.’  Furthermore, Shaykhīs believed that ‘the appearance of the Qā’im is the Day of Judgment. Thus, to say that Islam will last until the Day of Judgment is true in the sense that Islam will last until the Qā’im appears…   


Rafati further explains that: ‘In the Day of Judgment as understood by Shaykh Aḥmad, revolutions, changes, and transformations will take place, but not in the way that people literally understand from the text. In this interpretation of the Day of Judgment, Shaykh Aḥmad attempts to reconcile intellect and revelation. The universe will not come to an end on the Day of Judgment; it has always existed and will continue to exist forever. What the Day of Judgment truly means is the advent of a new manifestation of God which puts an end to the course of its previous dispensation and opens a new cycle for human beings. As the Day of the advent of the promised Qā’im, the Day of Judgment will bring about changes in the social, moral, and religious life of the people; the values that have been applied for centuries will change, the principles and teachings of the previous religion will change, and a profound revolution will take place in all the various aspects of man’s activities’.  The ‘Meeting with God’, moreover, is also to be understood in this context. Rafati writes that ‘he interprets the meeting with God described in the Qur’ān as “seeing” God with the heart. Seeing God would not be visually beholding God’s Essence, but rather seeing God’s manifestation. This is possible when man’s heart has faith in Him, His actions, works, and teachings… As for seeing God on the Day of Judgment, Shaykh Ahmad has another interpretation. As previously stated, on the basis of the Islamic Traditions, Shaykh Ahmad interprets the Day of Judgement as the Day of the advent of the expected Qā’im’.  In other words, the coming of the Qā’im is the Day of Judgement, and the Qā’im Himself is a ‘Manifestation of God’. By attaining unto the presence of the Qā’im and believing Him, one has attained unto the presence of God and the ‘Meeting with God’ promised in the Qur’ān. 


The teachings of these various Prophets and Messengers of God were revealed to numerous peoples and nations. In the time of Adam, religion was in the form of a seed. While the core of religion does not change, the teachings are revealed progressively over time as humanity develops. When Adam appeared in the 4th or 5th millennium BC, humanity was just beginning to develop civilization.  Agriculture had begun, writing was being formed, and the first cities were beginning to develop. Thus, one of Adam’s sons, Cain, was a tiller of the soil, whereas another son, Abel, was a pastoralist. Cain murdered Abel and, due to the prohibition of murder, Cain was exiled for this crime.  Each subsequent revelation introduced more advanced teachings, greater spiritual understandings, and new laws and practices.  For example, Noah introduced the Noahide laws, also called the Noachian Laws or the ‘Seven Laws of Noah’.  Abraham introduced other laws, including circumcision.  Nevertheless, in His time, it was still permitted to marry one’s half-sister. He also appears to have abolished human sacrifice. Moses introduced a much more comprehensive system of laws, in the Torah, and Jesus abolished some of these while introducing other laws, such as a prohibition on divorce.  Even within His Dispensation, the Apostles permitted Gentiles to become Christians without the need for circumcision and removed prohibitions on eating certain foods.  


In the Qur’ān, Muhammad confirmed some of the laws of the Torah, while abolishing others and introducing new laws.  Thus, each Messenger of God changed the laws and teachings of the past, introducing new ones and bringing a greater and greater measure of truth. Muhammad sealed this six-thousand-year period of prophecy and revelation.  In doing so, He anticipated the coming of the Qā’im, who would be His own descendant  and would open up a new cycle of fulfilment.  The Prophetic Cycle, therefore, would end with Muhammad’s Dispensation, and was ‘sealed’ by Muhammad as the ‘Seal of the Prophets’,  and the Qā’im would open up the new Cycle of Fulfilment—or, rather, the Qā’im would be the midway point, the Primal Point, between the two Cycles. The new Cycle, which would also embrace the Dispensation of the Qā’im, would be inaugurated by the Return of Christ, who would be the great Prophet and Messenger whose coming would fulfil all the religions of the past, and would usher in a new age that would eventually bring about the unity of mankind under the shadow of true Islām. The Qā’im and Promised One of Islām is Sayyid ‘Alī-Muhammad Shīrāzī, known as the Báb (the ‘Gate’), and the Return of Christ and Promised One of All Religions is Mīrzā Husayn-‘Alī Nūrī, known as Bahá’u’lláh (the ‘Splendour of God’ or ‘Glory of God’). 


(8) The Meaning of Meeting with God



Bahá’u’lláh’s tent (tabernacle), which He raised on Mount Carmel 

‘…Who bear in mind that they shall meet their Lord, and that unto Him shall they return.’ 
- Qur’ān 2:46 
As mentioned above, the Qur’ān promises that the believers will meet with their Lord. This is despite the fact that God is not corporeal—He has no Body, no features, no shape or appearance. Moreover, God is exalted above ascent and descent, egress and regress, time and space, and has neither beginning nor end. Nevertheless, the Qur’ān says that He has a Face and Hands,  and that the believers will meet their Lord and enter His presence in Paradise. This is a spiritual mystery, and these verses are mutashābihāt ‘ambiguous’ or ‘metaphorical’.  As Rafati (1979) explains above, one of the great Islamic clerics, Shaykh Ahmad al-Ahsā’ī, the greatest Islamic scholar of the 18th and early 19th centuries, whose inspiration came directly from the Imāms who appeared to him in dreams and visions,  explained that the meaning of both the Day of Judgment and the ‘Meeting with God’ as meaning the coming of the Qā’im and attainment and recognition of Him. Shaykh Ahmad’s authority derived, primarily, from his spiritual insight, which allowed him to understand the mutashābihāt of the Qur’ān and the holy Traditions of the Prophet and the Imāms—and that spiritual insight and inspiration came directly from the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and the Imāms (peace be upon them) who appeared to him in dreams and visions.  He later wrote (in the Sharh-u l-Fawā’id): ‘The ulama derive their knowledge (taḥqīqāt ʿulūmihim) one from the other, but I have never followed in their way. I have derived what I know from the Imāms of guidance, and error cannot find its way into my words, since all that I confirm in my books is from them and they are preserved (maʿsūm) from sin and ignorance and error. Whoseover derives [his knowledge] from them shall not err, inasmuch as he is following them’.  In addition to being divinely-inspired, the Shaykh’s teachings also accord with reason and make sense, being a rational interpretation of the Qur’ān’s inner teachings, and the inner meanings of the Word of God. 

The Qur’ān states that the believers are those ‘who bear in mind that they shall meet their Lord, and that unto Him shall they return’ (2:46),  ‘and fear ye God, and know that ye must meet Him; and bear these good tidings to the faithful’ (2:223);  ‘But they who held it as certain that they must meet God, said, "How oft, by God's will, hath a small host vanquished a numerous host! and God is with the steadfastly enduring"’ (2:249);  ‘Lost are they who deny the meeting with God until "the Hour" cometh suddenly upon them!’ (6:31);  ‘He who hopes for the meeting of God,- verily, God's appointed time will come; and He both hears and knows’ (29:5);  ‘And those who disbelieve in God's signs and in meeting with Him, these shall despair of my mercy; and these, for them is grievous woe’ (29:23);  ‘On that day shall faces beam with light, outlooking towards their Lord’ (75:22 – 23).  We also know that He has a ‘Face’, e.g. He says: ‘There is no god but He. Everything (that exists) will perish except His own Face’ (28:88);  and ‘But the face of thy Lord shall abide resplendent with majesty and glory’ (55:27).  Likewise, He has ‘Hands’, as in Qur’ān 5:64: ‘The Jews say: "God's hand is tied up." Be their hands tied up and be they accursed for the (blasphemy) they utter. Nay, both His hands are widely outstretched’.  Yet we know that God cannot be seen, because He says (6:103): ‘No vision taketh in Him, but He taketh in all vision: and He is the Subtile, the All-informed’,  meaning that He is beyond vision or comprehension and does not exist in a visible or physical form. 

This is confirmed in Qur’ān 7:143, where Moses asked to behold God face-to-face: ‘When Moses came to the place appointed by Us, and his Lord addressed him, He said: "O my Lord! show (Thyself) to me, that I may look upon thee." God said: "By no means canst thou see Me (direct); But look upon the mount; if it abide in its place, then shalt thou see Me." When his Lord manifested His glory on the Mount, He made it as dust. And Moses fell down in a swoon. When he recovered his senses he said: "Glory be to Thee! to Thee I turn in repentance, and I am the first to believe"’.  This is despite the fact that, elsewhere, we are told that Moses did see God ‘face-to-face’, as in Exodus 33:11, where God says: ‘And the LORD spake unto Moses face to face, as a man speaketh unto his friend’.  However, this is clarified in Exodus 33:20, where God says: ‘And he said, Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live’,  and Exodus 33:23: ‘I will take away mine hand, and thou shalt see my back parts: but my face shall not be seen’.  This indicates that God both can and cannot be seen, so there must be a dual meaning to ‘seeing God’. In the literal sense, nobody can see God ‘and live’,  as in the example of when God showed Himself to the mountain and it turned to dust.   What we know is that Moses did encounter God on Mount Sinai and attained God’s presence at the Burning Bush, and He heard the voice of God. All of these things refer to the Word of God that is revealed through Moses. Moses Himself was a Primal Mirror of God, being a perfect, stainless mirror who embodied and reflected all the Names and Attributes of God, making Him a pure vessel for God’s Will and purpose. As such, Moses was a ‘Manifestation of God’. Just as Moses ‘saw God’ through His inner self, which is the Mirror of God, and through which His Light and Word (Logos) is made manifest, so, likewise, the Israelites encountered God through Moses, since, by attaining the presence of Moses, they attained the presence of God, and through listening to the Word of Moses, they heard the Word of God, because Moses was the Mouthpiece of God and the Manifestation of His Primal Will on Earth. 

The ’Meeting with God’ is explained by Bahá’u’lláh in the Kitáb-i-Iqán: ‘For the highest and most excelling grace bestowed upon men is the grace of “attaining unto the Presence of God” and of His recognition, which has been promised unto all people. This is the utmost degree of grace vouchsafed unto man by the All-Bountiful, the Ancient of Days, and the fulness of His absolute bounty upon His creatures… This people have repudiated all these verses, that unmistakably testify to the reality of “attainment unto the Divine Presence.” No theme hath been more emphatically asserted in the holy scriptures. Notwithstanding, they have deprived themselves of this lofty and most exalted rank, this supreme and glorious station…’  He clarifies that, by “attainment unto the Divine Presence” is meant recognising and attaining the presence of the Prophets who are endowed with constancy—the Manifestations of God. Bahá’u’lláh explains that ‘These Prophets and chosen Ones of God are the recipients and revealers of all the unchangeable attributes and names of God. They are the mirrors that truly and faithfully reflect the light of God. Whatsoever is applicable to them is in reality applicable to God, Himself, Who is both the Visible and the Invisible. The knowledge of Him, Who is the Origin of all things, and attainment unto Him, are impossible save through knowledge of, and attainment unto, these luminous Beings who proceed from the Sun of Truth. By attaining, therefore, to the presence of these holy Luminaries, the “Presence of God” Himself is attained. From their knowledge, the knowledge of God is revealed, and from the light of their countenance, the splendour of the Face of God is made manifest. Through the manifold attributes of these Essences of Detachment, Who are both the first and the last, the seen and the hidden, it is made evident that He Who is the Sun of Truth is “the First and the Last, the Seen, and the Hidden.”  Likewise the other lofty names and exalted attributes of God. Therefore, whosoever, and in whatever Dispensation, hath recognized and attained unto the presence of these glorious, these resplendent and most excellent Luminaries, hath verily attained unto the “Presence of God” Himself, and entered the city of eternal and immortal life. Attainment unto such presence is possible only in the Day of Resurrection, which is the Day of the rise of God Himself through His all-embracing Revelation’

Attainment of the Presence of God, therefore, and Meeting with the Lord, refer to the coming of the Manifestation of God in the Day of Resurrection, and the Day of Resurrection means, according to Bahá’u’lláh, when God comes ‘down to them overshadowed with clouds’, i.e. the coming of the Manifestation of God. The Qur’ān (2:210) says: hal yanẓurūna ’illā ’an ya’tiya-hum-u llāh-u fī ẓulal-in min-a l-ghamām-i wa l-malā’ika-t-u wa quḍiya l-’amr-u wa ’ila llāh-i tarju‘u l-’umūr [‘And are they contemplating/observing until that God cometh in the canopies of the clouds and the Angels, and the Cause/religion is ended/consummated, and to God return all things/affairs/causes’ (my literal translation)]. This is often translated as if it is a hypothetical. However, Shoghi Effendi translates the first part of this verse, hal yanẓurūna ’illā ’an ya’tiya-hum-u llāh-u fī ẓulal-in min-a l-ghamām-i as ‘What can such expect but that God should come down to them overshadowed with clouds’ which Bahá’u’lláh cites as a sign of the Day of Resurrection and referring to the coming of the Qā’im. The phrase quḍiya l-’amr-u ‘the Cause is ended’ refers to the consummation, end and fulfilment of the Cause of God, i.e. His religious Dispensation.  When God comes in the clouds of heaven, the ’Amr (Cause/Affair) or Dīn (Faith) is fulfilled and consummated, and the religious dispensation ends, in this case the Muhammadan Dispensation ends with the coming of the Qā’im, i.e. the Báb. The phrase, wa ’ila llāh-i tarju‘u l-’umūr, is translated by Yusuf Ali as ‘to God do all questions go back (for decision)’ and by Rodwell as ‘And to God shall all things return’, but I would argue that al-’umūr here, which is the plural of ’amr, can refer to all the religious dispensations returning to God, who is their Origin, implying that every ’amr (‘Cause’, ‘Affair’), including the religion and dispensation of Muhammad, must have an end, and will return to God, Who is its origin and Creator. This demonstrates the finality of the religion of the Qur’ān.  

This coming of the Lord in the clouds is also anticipated in the Bible. The Prophet Daniel wrote (7:13): ‘I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man [kə-ḇar ’ĕ-nāš] came with the clouds of heaven [‘im-‘ă-nā-nê šə-may-yā], and came to the Ancient of days [‘at-tîq yō-w-may-yā], and they brought him near before him’.  While the Qur’ān says that Allāh (God) will come in the canopies of the clouds,  the Prophet Daniel says that it is Bar ’Enāsh (the Son of Man), who comes before ‘Attîq Yōwmayyā (the Ancient of Days), who will come in the clouds of heaven. Speaking of the Return of Christ, Jesus said (Matthew 24:30): ‘And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory’‘Son of Man’ was a title used by Jesus Christ to refer to Himself. It is clear, then, that it is not the Essence of Allāh that will come in the clouds; rather, this is a reference to the coming of the Manifestation of God, who is His Perfect Mirror, i.e. the Messenger of God who comes with a Book. Just as Jesus came in the clouds of heaven when He was born of Mary, so will He return in the clouds of heaven, even as He said (John 6:38): ‘For I have come down from heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me’.  This indicates that Jesus came down from heaven the first time, not just when He returns in a future time. 

The Return of Christ would come in the same way as His first coming, i.e. down from heaven and with the clouds of heaven. The ‘clouds’ here refer to His Body, because a cloud blocks out the sun, just as the Body of Christ prevents us from seeing His nature, and His nature is that He is a Perfect Mirror of God and the Manifestation of the Logos (Word), which is the Primal Will of God. The Qur’ān itself identifies Jesus with this Primal Will, saying (Qur’ān 3:45): ’inna llāh-a yubashshir-u-ki bi-kalima-t-in min-hu sm-u-hu l-masīh-u ‘īsā bn-u maryam-a [‘Verily, God giveth glad-tidings/good news to thee (fem.) of a Word from Him—His Name is Christ/the Messiah Jesus, Son of Mary’ (my translation)].  Here Jesus is described as the Messiah and as a Manifestation of the Creative Word and Primal Will of God. A kalimah is literally a ‘word’, and here that Word comes ‘from Him’ (i.e. from God), meaning that the Primal Will of God proceeds from God (the Father), which accords with Jesus’s statement (John 14:10): ‘Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works’.  This indicates that Jesus Christ is a vessel for God’s Will and purpose, and that He is a Primal Mirror of God and Mouthpiece for His Word. By turning to Jesus Christ, we are turning to God, just as by turning to Muhammad, one is turning to God, because both Jesus and Muhammad are Primal Mirrors of God and Manifestations of His Primal Will. They appear in the ‘clouds of heaven’ because they have physical bodies, and those clouds block out the glory and majesty of Jesus and Muhammad, who are both the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End, because they are Manifestations of God (Allah). 

In the Gospel of Mark (14:62), Jesus is asked whether He is the Messiah (Christ), ‘the Son of the Blessed’  and He replied: ‘I am: and ye shall see [opsesthe] the Son of man [ton Huion tou anthrōpou] sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven [nephelōn tou ouranou]’.  This sounds like a future promise, since opsesthe is future indicative second person plural. However, in the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus says (Matthew 26:64): ‘Hereafter [ap’ arti] shall ye see [opsesthe] the Son of man sitting [kathēmenon] on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven’Aparti (apo + arti) literally means ‘from now’ or ‘from now on’ or ‘already’. One could thus translate this as saying ‘Already you see the Son of Man sitting on the right hand of power and coming with the clouds of heaven’. Both kathēmenon ‘sitting’ and erchomenon ‘coming’ are present participles. Thus, even while Jesus was standing before the Jewish Sanhedrin before they condemned Him to death, in the utmost poverty and abasement, He was, even at that moment, sitting at the right hand of God and coming in the clouds of heaven. This indicates the spiritual sovereignty of Christ and His power, as well as how He was veiled by the clouds, i.e. His physical body, which prevented the High Priest and others from recognising Him. In like manner, the Meeting with God and the coming of the Qā’im and Return of Christ, the two Messianic Figures promised in the Qur’ān and Hadiths, are one and the same, as is the descent of Allah (God) in the clouds of heaven promised in the Surah of Baqarah in the Qur’ān. All of these refer to one spiritual reality, which is the coming of the two Promised Ones of Islām, who are the Báb and Bahá’u’lláh. 

The Báb is the Qā’im or Mahdī promised in the Hadiths, and Bahá’u’lláh is the expected Return of Christ. While all Prophets are the Return of all Prophets, and thus Muhammad, the Báb and Bahá’u’lláh can all be called the ‘Return of Christ’, Bahá’u’lláh came with a Revelation at the plenitude of splendour, intended for the collective maturity of the human race, and providing the teachings that will  bring out the unification of all mankind in one universal Cause (’amr) and one common Law/Faith (sharī‘ah),  i.e. the Bahá’í Faith. Thus, while Jesus is called Bar ’Enāsh (the Son of Man) and Huios tou Eulogētou (the Son of the Beloved), Bahá’u’lláh is called ‘Attîq Yōwmayyā (the Ancient of Days), who comes ‘with power and great glory’ (meta dynameōs kai doxēs pollēs).  He it is whom the Qur’ān describes as yad‘u d-dā‘ī ’ilā shay’-in nukur, ‘the Summoner’ who ‘shall summon to a stern business’ (Qur’ān 54:6),  the ‘Great Announcement’ (an-naba’u l-‘aẓīm) (Qur’ān 78:2),  jā’a rabb-u-ka wa l-malak-u ṣaff-an ṣaff-an, ‘thy Lord’ Who shall come with ‘the angels, rank on rank’ (Qur’ān 89:22),  and wajh-u rabb-i-ka dhu l-jalāl-i wa l-ikrām, the ‘Countenance of thy Lord of Might and Glory’ (Qur’ān 55:27).  For more on this, see Muhammad Mustafa’s (1993) Bahá’u’lláh: The Great Announcement of the Qur’an.   To sum up, the Meeting with God in the Qur’ān means, in its general sense, the coming of any Manifestation of God, including Jesus and Muhammad, but more specifically refers to the coming of the Qā’im/Mahdī, i.e. the Báb (1819 – 1850), and the coming of the Return of Christ, i.e. Bahá’u’lláh (1817 – 1892), both of whom are Messengers of God and Prophets who are ‘endowed with constancy’ (’ūlū l-‘aẓm-i) (Qur’ān 46:35).  

(9) Conclusion—Bahá’u’lláh is Come

The Garden of Ridvān, frequented by Bahá’u’lláh 


‘He had seen Him [i.e. Gabriel, the Holy Spirit] also another time [nazla-t-an ’ukhrā, lit. ‘a second descent’], near the Sidrah-tree, which marks the boundary,  [sidra-t-i l-muntahā, i.e. the Tree beyond which there is no passing, here signifying Bahá’u’lláh], near which is the garden of repose [janna-t-u ma’āwā, ‘the Garden of the Habitation/Dwelling/Abode/Resting-Place/Refuge’,  i.e. the Presence of Bahá’u’lláh].  When the Sidrah-tree was covered with what covered it [i.e. it was veiled, meaning by the physical body of Bahá’u’lláh], His [i.e. Muhammad’s] eye turned not aside, nor did it wander! For he saw the greatest of the signs of his Lord [āyāt-i rabb-i-hi l-kubrā, lit. ‘the greatest verses/signs of His Lord’, meaning the Revelation of Bahá’u’lláh)]!’ 

- Qur’ān 53:13 – 18 


The sum of all of the above in this article is that there is ultimately only one religion,  which is progressively revealed to mankind (called al-’islām [Submission (to God)], al-’amr [the Cause/Affair/Matter] or ad-dīn [the Faith/Religion] in the Qur’ān),  that this process has neither beginning nor end,  that no religion or revelation is final,  that the Word of God can never be exhausted,  that each Prophet who comes with a Book starts a new religious dispensation (meaning the time period when the laws and teachings of that Book are in force),  that every religious dispensation and revelation is complete and perfected in and of itself,  that there has been a 6,000-year-long Prophetic Cycle that was inaugurated by the Prophet Adam (peace be upon Him) and ended or sealed by the Prophet Muhammad (upon whom be peace),  that Jesus Christ (peace be upon Him) brought the first truly universal religious dispensation,  that Muhammad’s dispensation was also universal and intended for all mankind,  that Muhammad came as a Mercy for all mankind,  that the Qur’ān is the infallible Word of God for all mankind, that Muhammad emphasised that He would not be succeeded immediately by a Prophet,  but instead by 12 deputies or ‘caliphs’ (also called the Twelve Imāms),  that His religion would stand and be in force until the Day of Judgment,  that the Day of Judgment means the coming of the Qā’im or Mahdī (the Promised One of Islām),  that the Qā’im would end the Muhammadan Dispensation and reveal a new Book and Revelation, that the Islamic ‘ulamā’ of His time would be mostly evil,  and the true knowledge of the Qur’ān would disappear,  that the world would oppose Him (and reign for only 7,  9  or 19 years),  that the Day of God will come suddenly and in a hidden way,  that the Qā’im would be followed by the Return of Jesus Christ afterwards,  that all Messengers of God who are ‘endowed with constancy’ [’ūlu l-‘aẓm] are pure Mirrors of God,  that they can be called Manifestations of God,  that they all manifest the Primal Will or Word of God,  that they are all the Mouthpieces of God,  that they are the Manifestations of the Beginning and the End—the Alpha and the Omega,  and that they are each the return of all previous Prophets,  that the Meeting with God or attainment unto the Presence of God means attainment unto the Presence of the Manifestation of God when He comes,  that the Manifestation of God brings true spiritual life,  and thus the resurrection and being ‘born again’,  and that the only Way to God is through recognising the Manifestation of God,  that the Qā’im or Mahdī or Twelfth Imām is Sayyid ‘Alī-Muhammad Shīrāzī—known as the Báb, and that the Return of Jesus Christ is Mīrzā Husayn-‘Alī Nūrī—known as Bahá’u’lláh, that Bahá’u’lláh is the Messenger of God for this day and age, that He is the Manifestation of God and Promised One of all religions,  that He is the One anticipated in the Bible and the Qur’ān whose coming is the Day of God, the Day of Judgment and the Resurrection, that He will abolish holy war,  and that true peace and happiness can only come from recognising Bahá’u’lláh and following His teachings. His religion will embrace all mankind; all people will eventually accept His Faith.  The Qur’ān and Islam are fulfilled through Bahá’u’lláh, and to be a true muslim (with a lower-case ‘m’), i.e. to submit to the Will of God, is to recognise Bahá’u’lláh. To be faithful to the Qur’ān and Islam, one must accept and believe in Bahá’u’lláh. 


To end this essay, we will look at some verses from the Qur’ān (about the coming of the Báb and Bahá’u’lláh) and some verses from Bahá’u’lláh—the Promised One of all religions:


‘Establish regular prayers – at the sun's decline till the darkness of the night [ghasiqa l-layl = an abjad value of 1260, i.e. until the year 1260 AH / 1844 AD], and the morning prayer and reading: for the prayer and reading in the morning carry their testimony’

– Qur’ān  17:78


‘He rules (all) affairs [al-’amr-a = an abjad value of 272, i.e. 272 lunar years from 610 AD to 260 AH] from the heavens to the earth: in the end will (all affairs) go up to Him, on a Day, the space whereof will be (as) a thousand years of your reckoning’  [i.e. from 260 AH, when the Affair, al-’amr, returned to God after the death of the 11th Imām, until the coming of the Qā’im in 1260 AH—a period of exactly 1,000 lunar years].

– Qur’ān 32:5


‘One day, the disturbing trumpet-blast [i.e. the coming of the Qā’im, the Báb] shall disturb it, which the second blast [i.e. the coming of Bahá’u’lláh] shall follow. Men's hearts on that day shall quake… Verily, it will be but a single blast’.  

– Qur’ān 79:6 – 8, 13 


‘Then it appeared good to them, even after they had seen the signs [al-’āyāt], to imprison [yasjununna-hu ‘secrete’, here meaning that the true Joseph would be hidden from Creation until revealed by God in 1863 AD]  him [the True Joseph, i.e. Bahá’u’lláh] until a time [ḥattā ḥīn-i = an abjad value of 68, i.e. 1268 AH / October 1851 – October 1852 AD]’.  

– Qur’ān 12:35


‘He [i.e. Bahá’u’lláh] is naught but a Remembrance for all the worlds [’in huwa ’illā dhikr-un li-l-‘ālamīna],  and ye shall surely know of His Announcement after a time [i.e. after the year 68, or 1268 AH / 1852 AD, when Bahá’u’lláh received His Revelation in Tehran] [wa la-ta‘lamunna naba’-a-hu ba‘da ḥīn-i] (my translation).  

– Qur’ān 38:87 – 88


‘When we sent two [i.e. Muhammad and the Báb] unto them and they charged them both with imposture - therefore with a third [i.e. Bahá’u’lláh] we strengthened them: and they said, "Verily we are the Sent unto you of God"’

– Qur’ān 36:14


‘And there shall be a blast on the trumpet [i.e. the Báb], and all who are in the Heavens and all who are in the Earth shall expire [fa-ṣaʿiqa ‘then they will die’, i.e. spiritual death until they recognised the Báb], save those whom God shall vouchsafe to live [i.e. the Bábís]. Then shall there be another blast on it [i.e. Bahá’u’lláh], and lo! arising they shall gaze around them’ [i.e. Bahá’u’lláh’s coming is a second Resurrection]. 

– Qur’ān 39:68


‘Concerning the Great Announcement [i.e. Bahá’u’lláh] [‘an-i n-naba’-i l-‘aẓīm-i]! …  Nay, they shall come to know [i.e. with the coming of the Báb] [kallā sa-ya‘lamūna]! Then again they shall come to know [i.e. with the coming of Bahá’u’lláh] [thumma sa-ya‘lamūna]! … On the day, the Spirit [i.e. Bahá’u’lláh]  and the angels will stand in rows—they will not speak, except whom the Compassionate permits, and he will say that which is correct/just  [yawm-a yaqūm-u r-rūḥ-u wa-l-malā’ika-t-u ṣaff-an lā yatakallamūna ’illā man ’adhina la-hu r-raḥmānu wa qāla ṣawāb-an]’  (my translation)

– Qur’ān 78:2, 5, 6, 38


‘And are they contemplating/observing until that God cometh [i.e. the coming of the Báb and Bahá’u’lláh] in the canopies of the clouds [fī ẓulal-in min-a l-ghamām-i] and the Angels, and the Cause/religion is ended/consummated [wa quḍiya l-’amr-u], and to God return all things/affairs/causes’ [i.e. all religious Dispensations come to an end]  (my  translation)

– Qur’ān 2:210


‘And thy Lord [i.e. Bahá’u’lláh] shall come with the Angels rank on rank [wa jā’a rabb-u-ka wa l-malak-u ṣaff-an ṣaff-an]’  (my translation)

– Qur’ān 89:22


Bahá’u’lláh writes, and His Word is the Word of God:


‘Furthermore, it is evident to thee that the Bearers of the trust of God are made manifest unto the peoples of the earth as the Exponents of a new Cause and the Bearers of a new Message. Inasmuch as these Birds of the Celestial Throne are all sent down from the heaven of the Will of God, and as they all arise to proclaim His irresistible Faith, they therefore are regarded as one soul and the same person. For they all drink from the one Cup of the love of God, and all partake of the fruit of the same Tree of Oneness. These Manifestations of God have each a twofold station. One is the station of pure abstraction and essential unity. In this respect, if thou callest them all by one name, and dost ascribe to them the same attribute, thou hast not erred from the truth. Even as He hath revealed: “No distinction do We make between any of His Messengers!”  For they one and all summon the people of the earth to acknowledge the Unity of God, and herald unto them the Kawthar of an infinite grace and bounty. They are all invested with the robe of Prophethood, and honoured with the mantle of glory. Thus hath Muḥammad, the Point of the Qur’án, revealed: “I am all the Prophets.”  …


‘It is clear and evident to thee that all the Prophets are the Temples of the Cause of God, Who have appeared clothed in divers attire. If thou wilt observe with discriminating eyes, thou wilt behold them all abiding in the same tabernacle, soaring in the same heaven, seated upon the same throne, uttering the same speech, and proclaiming the same Faith. Such is the unity of those Essences of being, those Luminaries of infinite and immeasurable splendour. Wherefore, should one of these Manifestations of Holiness proclaim saying: “I am the return of all the Prophets,” He verily speaketh the truth. In like manner, in every subsequent Revelation, the return of the former Revelation is a fact, the truth of which is firmly established. Inasmuch as the return of the Prophets of God, as attested by verses and traditions, hath been conclusively demonstrated, the return of their chosen ones also is therefore definitely proven. This return is too manifest in itself to require any evidence or proof. For instance, consider that among the Prophets was Noah. When He was invested with the robe of Prophethood, and was moved by the Spirit of God to arise and proclaim His Cause, whoever believed in Him and acknowledged His Faith, was endowed with the grace of a new life. Of him it could be truly said that he was reborn and revived, inasmuch as previous to his belief in God and his acceptance of His Manifestation, he had set his affections on the things of the world, such as attachment to earthly goods, to wife, children, food, drink, and the like, so much so that in the day-time and in the night season his one concern had been to amass riches and procure for himself the means of enjoyment and pleasure. Aside from these things, before his partaking of the reviving waters of faith, he had been so wedded to the traditions of his forefathers, and so passionately devoted to the observance of their customs and laws, that he would have preferred to suffer death rather than violate one letter of those superstitious forms and manners current amongst his people. Even as the people have cried: “Verily we found our fathers with a faith, and verily, in their footsteps we follow.”’  


‘Beware lest any name debar you from Him Who is the Possessor of all names, or any word shut you out from this Remembrance of God, this Source of Wisdom amongst you. Turn unto God and seek His protection, O concourse of divines, and make not of yourselves a veil between Me and My creatures. Thus doth your Lord admonish you, and command you to be just, lest your works should come to naught and ye yourselves be oblivious of your plight. Shall he who denieth this Cause be able to vindicate the truth of any cause throughout creation? Nay, by Him Who is the Fashioner of the universe! Yet the people are wrapped in a palpable veil. Say: Through this Cause the day-star of testimony hath dawned, and the luminary of proof hath shed its radiance upon all that dwell on earth. Fear God, O men of insight, and be not of those who disbelieve in Me. Take heed lest the word “Prophet” withhold you from this Most Great Announcement, or any reference to “Vicegerency” debar you from the sovereignty of Him Who is the Vicegerent of God, which overshadoweth all the worlds. Every name hath been created by His Word, and every cause is dependent on His irresistible, His mighty and wondrous Cause. Say: This is the Day of God, the Day on which naught shall be mentioned save His own Self, the omnipotent Protector of all worlds. This is the Cause that hath made all your superstitions and idols to tremble.

‘We, verily, see amongst you him who taketh hold of the Book of God and citeth from it proofs and arguments wherewith to repudiate his Lord, even as the followers of every other Faith sought reasons in their Holy Books for refuting Him Who is the Help in Peril, the Self-Subsisting. Say: God, the True One, is My witness that neither the Scriptures of the world, nor all the books and writings in existence, shall, in this Day, avail you aught without this, the Living Book, Who proclaimeth in the midmost heart of creation: “Verily, there is none other God but Me, the All-Knowing, the All-Wise.”

‘O concourse of divines! Beware lest ye be the cause of strife in the land, even as ye were the cause of the repudiation of the Faith in its early days. Gather the people around this Word that hath made the pebbles to cry out: “The Kingdom is God’s, the Dawning-place of all signs!” Thus doth your Lord admonish you, as a bounty on His part; He, of a truth, is the Ever-Forgiving, the Most Generous.’ 


‘VERILY I say, this is the Day in which mankind can behold the Face, and hear the Voice, of the Promised One. The Call of God hath been raised, and the light of His countenance hath been lifted up upon men. It behoveth every man to blot out the trace of every idle word from the tablet of his heart, and to gaze, with an open and unbiased mind, on the signs of His Revelation, the proofs of His Mission, and the tokens of His glory.


‘Great indeed is this Day! The allusions made to it in all the sacred Scriptures as the Day of God attest its greatness. The soul of every Prophet of God, of every Divine Messenger, hath thirsted for this wondrous Day. All the divers kindreds of the earth have, likewise, yearned to attain it. No sooner, however, had the Day Star of His Revelation manifested itself in the heaven of God’s Will, than all, except those whom the Almighty was pleased to guide, were found dumbfounded and heedless.’ 


‘By Him Who is the Great Announcement! The All-Merciful is come invested with undoubted sovereignty. The Balance hath been appointed, and all them that dwell on earth have been gathered together. The Trumpet hath been blown, and lo, all eyes have stared up with terror, and the hearts of all who are in the heavens and on the earth have trembled, except them whom the breath of the verses of God hath quickened, and who have detached themselves from all things.


‘This is the Day whereon the earth shall tell out her tidings. The workers of iniquity are her burdens, could ye but perceive it. The moon of idle fancy hath been cleft, and the heaven hath given out a palpable smoke. We see the people laid low, awed with the dread of thy Lord, the Almighty, the Most Powerful. The Crier hath cried out, and men have been torn away, so great hath been the fury of His wrath. The people of the left hand sigh and bemoan. The people of the right abide in noble habitations: they quaff the Wine that is life indeed, from the hands of the All-Merciful, and are, verily, the blissful.


‘The earth hath been shaken, and the mountains have passed away, and the angels have appeared, rank on rank, before Us. Most of the people are bewildered in their drunkenness and wear on their faces the evidences of anger. Thus have We gathered together the workers of iniquity. We see them rushing on towards their idol. Say: None shall be secure this Day from the decree of God. This indeed is a grievous Day. We point out to them those that led them astray. They see them, and yet recognize them not. Their eyes are drunken; they are indeed a blind people. Their proofs are the calumnies they uttered; condemned are their calumnies by God, the Help in Peril, the Self-Subsisting. The Evil One hath stirred up mischief in their hearts, and they are afflicted with a torment that none can avert. They hasten to the wicked, bearing the register of the workers of iniquity. Such are their doings.


‘Say: The heavens have been folded together, and the earth is held within His grasp, and the corrupt doers have been held by their forelock, and still they understand not. They drink of the tainted water, and know it not. Say: The shout hath been raised, and the people have come forth from their graves, and arising, are gazing around them. Some have made haste to attain the court of the God of Mercy, others have fallen down on their faces in the fire of Hell, while still others are lost in bewilderment. The verses of God have been revealed, and yet they have turned away from them. His proof hath been manifested, and yet they are unaware of it. And when they behold the face of the All-Merciful, their own faces are saddened, while they are disporting themselves. They hasten forward to Hell Fire, and mistake it for light. Far from God be what they fondly imagine! Say: Whether ye rejoice or whether ye burst for fury, the heavens are cleft asunder, and God hath come down, invested with radiant sovereignty. All created things are heard exclaiming: “The Kingdom is God’s, the Almighty, the All-Knowing, the All-Wise.”’ 


I understand that the above is a weighty message (qawl-an thaqīl-an),  but God’s message usually is. I hope, nevertheless, that I have adequately demonstrated to the reader the true meaning(s) of Seal of the Prophets, which does not mean that Muhammad (peace be upon Him) is the last Prophet, any more than He is the first Prophet, or all the Prophets. Likewise, I have, inshā’allāh, demonstrated that there is no finality in religion, because there is no finality in God’s Word and Revelation. Just as God is eternal and has neither beginning nor end, His creation has neither beginning nor end, because He is the Creator. Likewise, God’s way (His sunnah) never changes, so He will not change His method of guiding mankind. All of God’s attributes indicate permanent actions and qualities of God. Thus, even as God is Beauty, Light and Truth, He is also the Creator, the Sender of the Messengers, and the Lord of the Worlds.  Just as the Creator indicates that His creation has no beginning, nor any end, likewise His being the Sender means that He has always sent Messengers, sends Messengers, and will always send Messengers of God. There is no first Messenger of God, neither can there be a last Messenger of God. Even as there is an Adam, there is an Adam before Adam, and an Adam before that Adam. There is thus no First Prophet, even as there is no Last Prophet. Every Prophet is the First and the Last, the beginning and the end, the Alpha and the Omega, because each is the Mirror of that Primal Will that comes from God—His co-eternal Word (Logos, Kalimah). And as God is the Lord of the Worlds, His Revelation is not limited to Earth, this system, this galaxy, or even this known universe. Therefore, the idea that religion can ever end, or that there can be a ‘Last Day’ that is truly final, or a Final Judgement that ends all things, is illogical. For there will always be more planets, more worlds, more galaxies, more ‘universes’ where God’s Will and His Revelation continue. The Word of God, like the examples above from Bahá’u’lláh’s Writings, is the supreme Proof of the Messenger of God. Bahá’u’lláh is the supreme Manifestation of God and the Messenger of God for this Day and Age. If my essay has not proven this to you already, there is much more for you to read and study but, suffice it to say, the proofs of His Revelation are manifest and self-evident. As Bahá’u’lláh says:


‘Say: The first and foremost testimony establishing His truth is His own Self. Next to this testimony is His Revelation. For whoso faileth to recognize either the one or the other He hath established the words He hath revealed as proof of His reality and truth. This is, verily, an evidence of His tender mercy unto men. He hath endowed every soul with the capacity to recognize the signs of God. How could He, otherwise, have fulfilled His testimony unto men, if ye be of them that ponder His Cause in their hearts. He will never deal unjustly with any one, neither will He task a soul beyond its power. He, verily, is the Compassionate, the All-Merciful’.  


‘Know thou of a certainty that the Unseen can in no wise incarnate His Essence and reveal it unto men. He is, and hath ever been, immensely exalted beyond all that can either be recounted or perceived. From His retreat of glory His voice is ever proclaiming: “Verily, I am God; there is none other God besides Me, the All-Knowing, the All-Wise. I have manifested Myself unto men, and have sent down Him Who is the Day Spring of the signs of My Revelation. Through Him I have caused all creation to testify that there is none other God except Him, the Incomparable, the All-Informed, the All-Wise.” He Who is everlastingly hidden from the eyes of men can never be known except through His Manifestation, and His Manifestation can adduce no greater proof of the truth of His Mission than the proof of His own Person’. 


He is the Promised One! For more information on Bahá’u’lláh, see Bahaullah.org,  and read HM Balyuzi’s book, Bahá’u’lláh: The King of Glory.  Also, check out my short page on the life of Bahá’u’lláh here,  and for more information on the Bahá’í Faith, see Bahai.org and John Esslemont's book, Bahá’u’lláh and the New Era.  Also, check out my page, Nick’s Bahá’í FAQ).  You can find the Bahá’í Writings at the Bahá’í Reference Library.  I would also recommend watching the excellent free videos: Dawn of the Light,  about the life of the Báb, and Light to the World,  about the life of Bahá’u’lláh. Also, read my article on the “Meaning of the Return of Jesus Christ”,  which is closely related to this article and an essential companion to it.


Further religious articles that I’ve written, mainly on the topic of religion, Islam and the Qur’án, are below:


“The Meaning of the Return of Jesus Christ” (2025) 


“The Qur’ān’s Arguments for Belief in God” (2015) 


“A response to Stephen Fry’s condemnation of God” (2015)  


“Is Allāh the Arabic Word for God?” (2015) 


“5 Reasons the Qur’ān and US Constitution Can Coexist” (2015)  (A response to Steven Crowder’s blog post: ‘5 Reasons The Qur’an Can Never “Coexist” With the Constitution... Ever’.)


“A response to Ricky Gervais and his arguments about God and religion” (2017) 


“A Response to Jordan Peterson’s Comments on Islam” (2018) 


If you want to follow me on X, my account is @Nicholas19.  I also have another blog on Medium (https://nicholasbridgewater.medium.com/).  


Khodā Hāfez (May God be your Protector)! 


Abú-Jalál 


Go back to Part 2; go back to Part 1.


Bibliography


General 


The King James Bible (1611). Available online at: https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/ (accessed 4 January 2026)


Geneva Bible (1599). Available online at: http://www.genevabible.org/geneva.html (accessed 4 January 2026)


‘Abdu’l-Bahá (1912) The Promulgation of Universal Peace (Wilmette, Illinois: Bahá’í Publishing Trust). Available online at: https://www.bahai.org/library/authoritative-texts/abdul-baha/promulgation-universal-peace/ (accessed 10 February 2026)


Abdu’l-Bahá, Some Answered Questions (Wilmette, Illinois: Bahá’í Publishing Trust). Available online at: https://reference.bahai.org/en/t/ab/SAQ/index.html (accessed 10 January 2026)


Ayatollah Ibrahimi Amini (author), Dr. Sachedina al-Mahdi (translator) al-Imām al-Mahdī: The Just Leader of Humanity (Qum, Iran: Ansariyan Publications). Available online at: https://al-islam.org/al-imam-al-mahdi-just-leader-humanity-ibrahim-amini/chapter-14-signs-appearance-zuhur-mahdi ; https://al-islam.org/printpdf/book/export/html/13072 (accessed 8 February 2026) 


 حضرة بهاء الله, الفرائض والتعاليم الفردية - مدّة الدور البهائي (Duration of Bahá’í Dispensation). Available online at: https://oceanoflights.org/009-ord-duration-of-the-bahai-dispensation-ar/ (accessed 26 December 2025)


Bahá’u’lláh (author) Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh (Wilmette, Illinois: Bahá’í Publishing Trust). Available online at: https://reference.bahai.org/en/t/b/GWB/ (accessed 3 January 2026)


Bahá’u’lláh, The Kitáb-i-Aqdas (Most Holy Book) (Wilmette, Illinois: US Bahá’í Publishing Trust). Available online at: https://reference.bahai.org/en/t/b/KA/  (accessed 3 January 2025)


Bahá’u’lláh (author) The Kitáb-i-Íqán: The Book of Certitude (Wilmette, Illinois: Bahá’í Publishing Trust). Available online at: https://www.bahai.org/library/authoritative-texts/bahaullah/kitab-i-iqan/ (accessed 29 December 2025)


Bahá’u’lláh (author) Proclamation of Bahá’u’lláh (Wilmette, Illinois: US Bahá’í Publishing Trust). Available online at: https://reference.bahai.org/en/t/b/PB/index.html (accessed 10 January 2026)


Bahá’u’lláh (author) Tablets of Bahá’u’lláh Revealed After the Kitáb-i-Aqdas (Wilmette, Illinois: US Bahá’í Publishing Trust). Available online at: https://reference.bahai.org/en/t/b/TB/ (accessed 3 January 2026)


HM Balyuzi (1980) Bahá’u’lláh: The King of Glory (Oxford: George Ronald). Available online at: https://bahai-library.com/balyuzi_bahaullah_king_glory (accessed 3 January 2026) 


Abú-Rayhán Muhammad ibn Ahmad Al-Bírúní (author), Dr. C. Edward Sachau (translator) (1879) The Chronology of Ancient Nations, An English version of the Arabic Text of the Athâr-ul-Bâkiya of Albîrûnî, or “Vestiges of the Past,” collected and reduced to writing by the author in A.H. 390-1, A.D. 1000 (London: W.H. Allen & Co) 


John Calvin (1536), Henry Beveridge (translator) (1845) The Institutes of the Christian Religion (Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library), Chapter 9, p. 90. Available online at: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/c/calvin/institutes/cache/institutes.pdf (accessed 25 January 2026)


Shoghi Effendi (1953) Messages to the Bahá’í World: 1950–1957 (Wilmette, Illinois: US Bahá’í Publishing Trust) (1971 edition). Available online at: https://bahai-library.com/shoghi-effendi_messages_bahai_world (accessed 10 February 2026) 


Shoghi Effendi, The World Order of Bahá’u’lláh (Wilmette, Illinois: US Bahá’í Publishing Trust). Available online at: https://www.bahai.org/library/authoritative-texts/shoghi-effendi/world-order-bahaullah/ (accessed 10 February 2026)


John E. Esslemont (1923) Bahá’u’lláh and the New Era (London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd). Available online at: https://www.bahai.org/library/other-literature/publications-individual-authors/bahaullah-new-era/ (accessed 3 January 2026)


Flavius Josephus (author), William Whiston (translator) (1737) The Genuine Works of Flavius Josephus  the Jewish Historian Translated from the Original Greek (London), Antiquities of the Jews. Available online at: https://penelope.uchicago.edu/josephus/index.html (accessed 22 December 2025)


Denis Martin MacEoin (2009) The Messiah of Shiraz: Studies in Early and Middle Babism (London, Boston: Brill) 


Moojan Momen (2000) Islam and the Bahá’í Faith (Kidlington, Oxford: George Ronald) 


Muhammad Mustafa (author), Rowshan Mustafa (translator) (1993) Bahá’u’lláh: The Great Announcement of the Qur’an (Dhaka, Bangladesh: Bahá’í Publishing Trust). Available online at: https://bahai-library.com/mustafa_bahaullah_announcement_quran (accessed 1 January 2026)


R.H. Charles Oxford (1913) The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament in English (Oxford: The Clarendon Press). Available online at: https://www.ccel.org/c/charles/otpseudepig/enoch/ENOCH_2.HTM ; https://archive.org/details/apocryphapseudep02charuoft/page/i/mode/1up (accessed 1 January 2026) 


William Sears (1961) Thief in the Night: The Case of the Missing Millennium (Oxford: George Ronald). Available online at: https://bahai-library.com/pdf/s/sears_thief_night.pdf (accessed 29 December 2025) 


Gook K.S. Shavakshal (1976) Zoroastrianism: The Parsi Faith, p. 148. Available online at: https://www.tparents.org/Library/Unification/Books/WorldRel1/WorldRel1-2.pdf (accessed 29 December 2025)


Abu Ja'far Muhammad Bin Jarir At-Tabari (author), Ismail K. Poonawala (translator) (1990) The History of al-Tabari, Volume IX: The Last Years of the Prophet (Albany, New York: State University of New York Press)


Najmuddin Tabasi (author), Mansoor L. Limba (translator) (2003) An Overview of the Mahdi’s (‘atfs) Government, “The Government of Truth” (Ahlul Bayt World Assembly), Al-Islam.org. Available online at: https://al-islam.org/overview-mahdis-atfs-government-najmuddin-tabasi/government-truth (accessed 3 January 2026) 


Martin Litchfield West (2010) The Hymns of Zoroaster: A New Translation of the Most Ancient Sacred Texts of Iran (I.B.Tauris) 


Articles


NJ Bridgewater (2002) “Nick’s Frequently Asked Questions About the Bahá’í Faith”. Available online at: https://web.archive.org/web/20251102090959/https://klausjames.tripod.com/bahai.html (accessed 3 January 2026)


NJ Bridgewater (2004) “Nick’s Frequently Asked Questions about the Bahá’í Faith (Part Three): Founders of the Divine Religions”, BAHÁ’U’LLÁH. Available online at: https://web.archive.org/web/20230605102402/https://klausjames.tripod.com/bahai3bahaullah.html (accessed 3 January 2026) 


NJ Bridgewater (2009) “Arabic Influence on Persian: The extent to which the Persian language has been influenced by the Arabic language”, BA Dissertation (University of Manchester), 15 May 2009


NJ Bridgewater (2015) “Is Allah the Arabic Word for God?” Crossing the Bridge, 20 December 2015. Available online at: https://nicholasjames19.blogspot.com/2015/12/is-allah-arabic-word-for-god.html (accessed 25 December 2025)


NJ Bridgewater (2025) “The Meaning of the Return of Jesus Christ”, Crossing the Bridge, 20 December 2025. Available online at: https://nicholasjames19.blogspot.com/2025/12/the-meaning-of-return-of-jesus-christ.html (accessed 22 December 2025) 


Christopher Eames (2022) “967 B.C.E.: How the Lynchpin Date for Solomon’s Temple Was Determined”, Armstrong Institute of Biblical Archaeology, 23 April 2022.  Available online at: https://armstronginstitute.org/685-967-bce-how-the-lynchpin-date-for-solomons-temple-was-determined#:~:text=Beyond%20that%2C%20Coucke%20noted%20the,1%20Kings%206:1 (accessed 30 December 2025)


Farhan Iqbal (2025) “Meanings of the word Khatam from Arabic dictionaries”, Al-Islam.org. Available online at: https://www.alislam.org/articles/meanings-of-word-khatam-from-arabic-dictionaries/ (accessed 28 December 2025) 


Tafsir Ibn Katheer in English”. Available online at:  https://surahquran.com/tafsir-english-aya-40-sora-33.html (accessed 28 December 2025) 


Stephen Lambden (2006) “TB Lawh-i-zuhur Introductory Notes”, Hurqalya Publications: Center for Shaykhī and Bābī-Bahā’ī Studies, UC Merced, last partially revised 27th March 2015 + 10-12-2022 (accessed 26 December 2025) 


“Maimonides’ Thirteen Principles of the Faith”, translated by David R. Blumenthal. Available online at: http://davidblumenthal.org/Maimonides'%20Principles%20(DRB)%20.pdf (accessed 22 December 2025) 


Natasha Pajda (2011/12) “The Essenes at Qumran: The Concept of a Suffering Messiah” (Research Paper). Available online at: https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/sites.stedwards.edu/dist/9/186/files/2011/12/qumran-messiah-research-paper.pdf (accessed 22 December 2025)


Vahid Rafati (1979) The Development of Shaykhī Thought in Shī‘ī Islam, A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Islamic Studies (University of California, Los Angeles, 1979), p. 169. Available online at: https://bahai-library.com/pdf/r/rafati_development_shaykhi_thought.pdf (accessed 31 December 2025) 


A. Shapur Shahbazi (1977) ‘The 'Traditional Date of Zoroaster' Explained’ (Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, 1977, Vol. 40, No. 1 (1977), pp. 25-35) 


Ismael Velasco (2020) “Reflections on Baha'u'llah's Claims to Being the Return of Imam Husayn”, 2020-06, Bahá’í Library Online (work in progress). Available online at: https://bahai-library.com/velasco_bahaullah_return_husayn (accessed 3 January 2026) 


Brian Windle (2022) “Top Ten Discoveries Related to Moses and the Exodus”, Associates for Biblical Research, 29 July 2022.  Available online at: https://biblearchaeology.org/research/chronological-categories/exodus-era/4919-top-ten-discoveries-related-to-moses-and-the-exod (accessed 30 December 2025) 


Qur’ān Translations


Abdullah Yusuf Ali (translator) (1934, reprinted 2010) The Holy Qur’an: Translation & Commentary (Birmingham, England: IPCI: Islamic Vision). Available online at: https://sacred-texts.com/isl/yaq/index.htm (accessed 10 January 2026)


Edward Henry Palmer (translator) (1880) The Qur'ân (Oxford: Clarendon Press). Available online at: https://sacred-texts.com/isl/sbe06/index.htm (accessed 10 January 2026)


Mohammed Marmaduke Pickthall (translator) (1938) The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (Hyderabad-Deccan: Government Central Press). Available online at: https://sacred-texts.com/isl/pick/index.htm (accessed 10 January 2026)


J.M. Rodwell (translator) (1876) Available online at:  https://sacred-texts.com/isl/qr/index.htm (accessed 10 January 2026)


Sale Available online at:


Hadith Sources / References


‘Aqd ad-Durar, p. 239


‘Ayyashi, Tafsir ‘Ayyashi, vol. 2, p. 326


Muhammad-Bāqir al-Majlisī, Biḥār-u l-’Anwār, vol. 25, p. 16; vol. 108, p. 253; vol. 52, p. 363; vol. 52, p. 354; chapter 5; vol. 52, p. 298; vol. 51, p. 1


Dala’il al-Imamah, p. 233


Ad-Durr al-Manthūr, vol. 5, p. 204


Imam Ahmad, At-Tabarani, Ibn Hibban, Al-Haakim, Al-Albany


Firdaws al-Akhbar, vol. 4, p. 6


Jāmi‘ al-Bayān, vol. 6, p. 183


Jami`at-Tirmidhi 3730, Book 49, Hadith 127; 2202; Vol. 1, Book 46, Hadith 3731; Vol. 1, Book 46, Hadith 3788


Al-Ghaybah by al-Nu‘mani, p. 331


Kashf al-Ghummah, vol. 3, p. 271


Ibn Batriq, ‘Umdah, p. 439


Ibn Tawus, Malahim, p. 142


Ikhtisas, p. 257


Ithbat al-hudat, Vol. 7, p. 83; p. 110,


al-Mu‘jam al-Kabir by al-Tabarani, vol. 8, p. 101


Ar-Rāzī, At-Tafsīr al-Kabīr, vol. 25, p. 214


Riyad as-Salihin 655


Sahih al-Bukhari 3455, Book 60, Hadith 122; Vol. 1, No. 668, Book of Prophets, p. 490


Sahih Muslim 1822a; 1821d; 1821e


Sunan Abī Dāwūd 4284


Sunan Abī Dāwūd 4285


Sunan Ibn Majah 4039; 4048; 4083


Sunan an-Nasa’i 2874


Al-Ghaybah by al-Tusi, p. 479


Az-Zamakhsharī, al-Kashshāf, vol. 2, p. 433


Yanabi‘ al-Mawaddah, p. 432


Wikipedia / Reference Works


Anno Mundi (Wikipedia article). Available online at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anno_Mundi (accessed 30 December 2025)


The Bahá’í Faith: The Official Website of the Worldwide Bahá’í Community”. Available online at: https://www.bahai.org/ (accessed 3 January 2026) 


“Bible Timeline”, Bible Hub. Available online at: https://biblehub.com/timeline/old.htm (accessed 30 December 2025)


“The Biblical Timeline”. Available online at: https://www.thebiblicaltimeline.org/articles-videos/before-abraham/ (accessed 31 December 2025)


“The Chronological Debate From Adam to Abraham: In Defense of the Masoretic Text”, Armstrong Institute of Biblical Chronology, 27 June 2023. Available online at: https://armstronginstitute.org/853-the-chronological-debate-from-adam-to-abraham-in-defense-of-the-masoretic-text (accessed 30 December 2025)


“Code: 105, Subject: Existence, attributes, and actions of the Mahdi”, ‘Question & Answer’, The website of Mansoor Hashemi Khorasani. Available online at: https://www.alkhorasani.com/en/q-a/3253/ (accessed 3 January 2026) 


Daena (Wikipedia article). Available online at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daena (accessed 26 December 2025)


“Estimating Joseph’s Timeline”. Available online at: https://ready4eternity.com/estimating-josephs-timeline/ (accessed 31 December 2025)


“Good question... ...Was Terah 70 or 130 when Abraham was born?”, A Christian Think Tank, updated Nov/2005. Available online at: https://www.christian-thinktank.com/abebirth.html (accessed 31 December 2025)


History of Sumer (Wikipedia article). Available online at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Sumer (accessed 8 February 2026).


Homoousion (Wikipedia article). Available online at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homoousion (accessed 25 January 2026)


Edward William Lane, Stanley Lane-Poole (1863) An Arabic-English Lexicon (London: Williams and Norgate)


Muhammad’s first revelation (Wikipedia article). Available online at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad%27s_first_revelation (accessed 26 December 2025)


Seven Laws of Noah (Wikipedia article). Available online at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah (accessed 8 February 2026)


Quranic Arabic Corpus, Quran Dictionary, ‘s-l-m’. Available online at: https://corpus.quran.com/qurandictionary.jsp?q=slm (accessed 25 December 2025)


Rev. James Ussher (1658) The Annals of the World deduced from The Origin of Time, and continued to the beginning of the Emperor Vespasians Reign, and the total Destruction and Abolition of the Temple and Common-wealth of the Jews (London: E. Tyler). See: https://www.swartzentrover.com/cotor/e-books/christ/ussher/ussher_age3.htm (accessed 26 December 2025) 


Ussher chronology (Wikipedia article). Available online at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ussher_chronology (accessed 30 December 2025)


Hans Wehr, J. Milton Cowan (1979) A Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic (4th edition, Harrosowitz)


Friday, 27 March 2026

The Meaning of Seal of the Prophets (part 2 of 3)

Abú-Jalál

27 March 2026


(4) The Meaning of Seal of the Prophets


Kaaba of Mecca


‘SAY to them: O men! Verily I am God's apostle to you all; Whose is the kingdom of the Heavens and of the Earth! Therefore believe on God but He! He maketh alive and killeth! Therefore believe on God, and his Apostle – the unlettered Prophet - who believeth in God and his word. And follow him that ye may be guided aright.’ 

- Qur’ān 7:158


The next topic that must be addressed is the term ‘Seal of the Prophets’ (khātam-u n-nabīyīn)—a much misunderstood and misinterpreted term that is often used as a veil to obstruct the truth, an obstacle between the seeker and the object of his desire, a barrier between the wayfarer and God, and a baton with which to attack the true Faith of God. For traditional Muslims, it is a term which bespeaks the finality and completeness of the religion of Muhammad, that the door of revelation has closed, that God’s hands are tied up, and that there will be no further Prophets or Messengers of God. For the Bábīs and Bahá’ís, it is a term whose true meaning has now been revealed and which now shines resplendent as the day, manifest for all those who seek after truth. It is a true title of Muhammad (peace be upon Him) and it is a phrase full of inner mystery, potency and light, which, when revealed to mankind, bespeaks both the greatness and majesty of the Prophet Muhammad and His uniqueness. 


Muhammad is a peerless and pre-existent Light, an eternal and glorious Figure, and a pure Mirror of the Countenance of God. He is a Primal Mirror of that eternal King, mirroring forth and manifesting in His Person all the Names and Attributes of God in the utmost splendour. Possessing the Most Great Infallibility, the Prophet Muhammad was the Revealer of God’s Word. His every action was divine, His every Word was God’s Word, His every movement was God’s movement, and, in His Being, as the Perfect and Primal Mirror of God, one can see only God Himself. Thus is Muhammad the Manifestation of both the First and the Last, the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End, the Eternal Logos or Word of God made flesh, as we find it described in the Gospel of John, ‘In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not’.  These words speak as truly of Jesus Christ as they do of Muhammad, who was the Light of the World and had the same essential nature, attributes, quality and authority as Jesus Christ (and hence was the Return of Christ in spirit). Therefore, as Muhammad is the Manifestation of the First and the Last, the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End, so also is He the Seal of the Prophets. He is the First Prophet, and He is the Last Prophet, as there is neither beginning nor end, first or last, in the realm of God. We will look at this point in more detail below. 


The phrase khātam-u n-nabīyīna appears once in the Qur’ān, at Qur’ān 33:40. In that verse, God says: mā kāna muḥammad-un ’abā ’aḥad-in min rijāl-i-kum wa-lākin rasūl-a llāh-i wa khātam-a n-nabīyīna wa-kāna llāh-u bi-kull-i shay’-in ‘alīm-an (‘Muḥammad has not been the father of anyone of your men, but He is the Messenger of God and the Seal of the Prophets and God is, over all things, Knowing’ [my translation]).  The context of the verse is this: God is clarifying that, as no male child of the Prophet lived until puberty, He is not the biological father of any son. His wife, Khadījah, bore Him three sons: Al-Qāsim, At-Tayyib, and At-Tāhir, but they all died in childhood. He had several daughters with Khadījah, i.e. Fātimah, Zaynab, Ruqayyah and Umm Kulthūm. The Prophet also had an adopted son called Zayd. This verse confirmed that Zayd was no longer permitted to call himself ‘Zayd bin Muhammad’, as father or son refer to biological relationships only.  The first part of this verse is thus clear (i.e.  mā kāna muḥammad-un ’abā ’aḥad-in min rijāl-i-kum). The next part, wa-lākin rasūl-a llāh-i ‘But [He is] the Messenger of God’ is also clear. This means that He is the Messenger of God for His Day and age. This is immediately followed by wa khātam-a n-nabīyīna ‘and the Seal of the Prophets’. This is a unique phrase, as it appears nowhere else in the Qur’ān. It is thus mutashābih ‘ambiguous’—the Qur’ānic verses are divided into those that are muḥkamāt ‘clear, perspicuous’ and those which are mutashābihāt ‘ambiguous’.  


This is based on the Qur’ānic verse (3:7): ‘He it is who hath sent down to thee "the Book." Some of its signs are of themselves perspicuous [muḥkamāt]; - these are the basis of the Book - and others are figurative [mutashābihāt]. But they whose hearts are given to err, follow its figures, craving discord, craving an interpretation; yet none knoweth its interpretation but God. And the stable in knowledge say, "We believe in it: it is all from our Lord." But none will bear this in mind, save men endued with understanding’.  The Book here refers to the Qur’ān as well as previous scriptures. The verses in the ‘Book’ are divided into two categories, muḥkamāt ‘clear, perspicuous’ and mutashābihāt ‘ambiguous’, here translated as ‘figurative’, i.e. metaphorical. The key point here is that, in relation to the mutashābihāt, God says: wa-mā ya‘lam-u ta’wīl-a-hu ’illā llāh-i wa r-rāsikhūna fi l-‘ilm (‘and no one knoweth the interpretation thereof but God and the well-grounded ones/firmly established in knowledge’ [my translation]). In other words, the phrase ‘Seal of the Prophets’ has a hidden meaning, which no Islamic scholar can definitively interpret. The rāsikhūna fi l-‘ilm refers to those who truly understand God’s Word, e.g. figures such as Imām ‘Alī or Imām Husayn. As Bahá’u’lláh writes: 


‘Even as thou dost witness how the people of the Qur’án, like unto the people of old, have allowed the words “Seal of the Prophets” to veil their eyes. And yet, they themselves testify to this verse: “None knoweth the interpretation thereof but God and they that are well-grounded in knowledge.”  And when He Who is well-grounded in all knowledge, He Who is the Mother, the Soul, the Secret, and the Essence thereof, revealeth that which is the least contrary to their desire, they bitterly oppose Him and shamelessly deny Him. These thou hast already heard and witnessed. Such deeds and words have been solely instigated by leaders of religion, they that worship no God but their own desire, who bear allegiance to naught but gold, who are wrapt in the densest veils of learning, and who, enmeshed by its obscurities, are lost in the wilds of error.’ 


What, therefore, does ‘Seal of the Prophets’ mean? The term is often associated with the mistaken concept of the ‘finality of Islam’. In previous religious dispensations (see below for a definition of ‘dispensation’), Prophets had often been succeeded by their firstborn son or chosen son, e.g. Abraham (upon whom be peace), was succeeded by Isaac, with whom He had made a covenant. Isaac was, in turn, succeed by His chosen son, Jacob (Israel), the father of the Israelites. The spiritual heir of Jacob was Joseph. Abraham was a Greater Prophet or ‘Prophet endowed with constancy’,  who brought a ‘Book’ and founded a religion.  Although this ‘Book’ was not written down, His Teachings are recorded in the Book of Genesis. Isaac, Jacob and Joseph were all Lesser Prophets, who confirmed the revelation of their Ancestor. They represent a chain of succession, from one prophet to another. Other examples include David, who was succeeded by Solomon—both Lesser Prophets, and Zechariah, who was succeeded by John the Baptist—both Lesser Prophets. Other Prophets were succeeded by appointed Prophet-successors, e.g. Elijah was followed by Elisha. Moses, a Greater Prophet, was contemporary with His brother, Aaron, who was a Lesser Prophet, and the first High Priest of the Israelites (and ancestor of the Cohens). Moses was also succeeded as leader of the Israelites by Joshua. This is important to bear in mind when understanding the term ‘Seal of the Prophets’ or the ‘Last/Final Prophet’ or ‘Last Messenger of God’. 


The word khātam comes from the Arabic verb khatama ‘to seal’, which is a synonym of ṭaba‘a which means to seal, impress, to impress with a stamp, seal or signet, print, etc.  It thus relates to the physical act of sealing something, imprinting something or setting a seal or signet upon something, e.g. a letter or something which is sealed up. Think of Tutankhamun’s tomb, which was sealed up for more than 3,000 years. The meaning of khatama includes the meanings of to seal off, close, make impervious or inaccessible. In the context of the phrase khātam-a n-nabīyīna, ‘Seal of the Prophets’, this can mean the Best or most perfect of the Prophets, the embellishment or ornament of the Prophets, or, alternatively, the last of the Prophets.  Jalālu d-Dīn as-Suyūtī (c. 1445 – 1505) reported that Imām ‘Alī said that khātam must be read as khātam, thus conveying the meanings of ‘ring’ or ‘ornament’ rather than khātim, which conveys ‘end’ or ‘finality’.  as-Suyūtī  also quotes a tradition from ‘Ā’ishah bint ’Abī-Bakr (c. 614 – 678), the wife of the Prophet, who said: “Say ‘khātam an-nabiyyin’, and do not say ‘there is no prophet after him’”.  The famous commentator, at-Tabarī, in his commentary on the Qur’ān, states that ‘Seal of the Prophets’ means ‘that he [Muhammad] has sealed prophethood and placed his mark upon it (ṭaba‘a ‘alay-hā) and so this is not open to anyone after him until the coming of the [Last] Hour’.  This interpretation appears to be correct, as it (a) makes it clear that no Prophet would follow Muhammad within the Muhammadan Dispensation, and (b) that Prophecy and Revelation could continue after the Last Hour, meaning that there is no finality of religion. In other words, there could be no further Prophet within the time-period in which the laws and teachings of Muhammad are applicable, i.e. His Dispensation. Depending on the meaning of the ‘Last Hour’, a new Prophet or Messenger of God could come after that event has occurred. The Hour, Judgment, Last Day and Resurrection are themselves mutashābihāt, i.e. metaphorical terms which refer not to physical events but spiritual concepts with greater inner meanings.  


Further clarification of this point is found in numerous other commentaries, including those of Abu’l-Qāsim Mahmūd az-Zamakhsharī (1074 – 1143), a Mu‘tazilite scholar and theologian of Persian descent, who writes: ‘”And” he is the “Seal of the Prophets” – which means that had he (Muhammad) had any son who reached the age of manhood, he (the son) would have been a prophet and he (Muhammad) would not have been the ‘Seal of the Prophets’; for it is related of him (Muhammad) that he said concerning Ibrahim (Muhammad’s son) when he died: “had he lived, he would have been a prophet”’.  Ibrahim was the Prophet’s son by His wife (or concubine) Maria the Copt,  but he died at the age of two years’ old. In other words, ‘Seal of the Prophets’ here does not mean that there could never be a future Prophet or Messenger of God. Rather, it means that Muhammad had no son, and, therefore, His immediate successor would not be a Prophet. This is confirmed by the Persian polymath, Fakhr ad-Dīn ar-Rāzī (c. 1149 - 1209), who writes: ‘And so [Allah] Almighty has denied his [Muhammad] being the father of any son in the proof that He gives establishing certain aspects of fatherhood. And so He says: “rather he is the Messenger of Allah”, For the Messenger of Allah is like a father to his people in his compassion towards them and in the respect they owe him… Furthermore He informs us about the greater compassion on his part and the greater respect they owe him in His words “Seal of the Prophets”. And this is because a prophet is [usually] one who is followed by another prophet, so that if he omits any advice or explanation, this can be rectified by the one who follows him. But the one who does not have a prophet coming after him is more compassionate towards his people, and must guide them better and give them more.’  In other words, the term only relates to Muhammad’s immediate successor not being a Prophet. Only a very literalistic interpretation of the Qur’ān and hadiths, therefore, can make one believe in the finality of Islam. In reality, this verse does not preclude the coming of future Messengers or Prophets, especially after the Last Hour or Judgement. 


Moojan Momen (2000), a Bahá’í scholar who had studied this issue, also concludes that ‘There is much historical evidence that there was no general agreement among the early Muslims that the phrase ‘Seal of the Prophets’ meant that there would be no prophets after Muḥammad. Certainly up to the middle of the 3rd Islamic century there is a great deal of evidence from literary and historical sources for this. It is thought that the doctrine of Muḥammad being the final prophet was adopted as official Islamic doctrine in the early years of the 4th Islamic century (late 10th century AD), mainly as a counter to the numerous revolts that had occurred and were still occurring against the caliphate in the name of various persons claiming to be prophets. By making the doctrine of the finality of prophethood in Muḥammad a central tenet of Islam, the Muslim authorities were able to stem the tide of revolts so successfully that in the centuries since that time there have been only a handful of such claimants.’  Momen cites examples of commentaries prior to the 3rd century which do not refer to the concept of finality. Moreover, the concept of the finality would contradict other parts of the Qur’ān, as discussed below. As the Qur’ān says (2:85): ‘Believe ye then part of the Book, and deny part?’ To conclude this question, therefore, ‘Seal of the Prophets’ has many meanings, as it is a metaphorical and ambiguous term. However, it is clear that none of these meanings imply that God will no longer reveal his Word and will not send future Prophets or Messengers. 


(5) The Finality of Islām and Religion

The Temple of Solomon, Jerusalem

‘‘And this to his children did Abraham bequeath, and Jacob also, saying, "O my children! truly God hath chosen a religion for you; so die not unless ye be also Muslims." Were ye present when Jacob was at the point of death? when he said to his sons, "Whom will ye worship when I am gone?" They said, "We will worship thy God and the God of thy fathers Abraham and Ismael and Isaac, one God, and to Him are we surrendered (Muslims)."’ 
- Qur’ān 2:132 – 133 

I have discussed above various examples of religious claims that each Book is complete in itself and cannot be added to or subtracted from. In a literal sense, this is the finality of religion. Zoroastrians believe that there will be three Messianic Figures who will appear in the end of times, but they do not believe their religion will be changed or altered. Rather, they believe that the Message of the Prophet Zoroaster (peace be upon Him) is complete in itself and cannot be changed or altered, subtracted from or added unto. There is no scope for further prophets to appear who will add new laws, abrogate the existing laws of Zoroaster, or change in any way His Teachings. Likewise, the followers of Moses, i.e. the  Jews and Samaritans, believe that Moses revealed the Torah (or Pentateuch as it is called in Greek) for all time, that the law of the Torah cannot be changed or altered, and that it is the final Book of God which cannot be altered or changed, subtracted from or added unto. Like Zoroastrians, Jews believe that there will be a Messiah. In fact, as I point out in my article on the “The Meaning of the Return of Jesus Christ”,  the Jews at one time expected that two or three Messianic Figures would appear. They expected the Return of Elijah (according to the prophecy of the Prophet Malachi),  who had bodily ascended to heaven according to a literal reading of the Biblical narrative,  as well as the coming of the Messiah, who would be a kingly figure.  The Essenes believed that there would be both a Priestly Messiah (from the line of Aaron)  and a Davidic Messiah (from the line of David and the Royal House of Judah).  The Sadducees believed that the Torah was all that Jews needed, and they rejected the Prophets and the concept of the Last Day and the Resurrection.  The Pharisees believed that the Messiah would come, but emphasised, as we read from Maimonides above, that the Torah could not be changed. The Messiah would be a king who ruled according to the law of the Torah. This was despite the fact that the Torah predicted the coming of a Prophet ‘like unto’ Moses (Deuteronomy 18:15  - 19), i.e. a Law-giver who reveals a Book similar to that of Moses.  

Christianity likewise suffers from the same belief in its own finality. Even though the main objection to the coming of Jesus of Nazareth was that He did not literally fulfil the prophecies of the Torah and the Neviim (Prophetic Books) in the Old Testament, nevertheless Christian theologians and priests throughout the ages have clung to a literal interpretation of the Gospels and New Testament writings to assert that the Christianity itself is final and immutable.  This is due to the belief that Jesus Christ died on the cross, was resurrected on the third day,  and that His death atoned for the sins of mankind, including the original sin of Adam.  Thus, whoever believes that Christ died for their sins and was resurrected on the third day is saved from hellfire and damnation. As Adam sinned and condemned all of mankind to damnation, so did Jesus bring salvation from death,  for the wage of sin is death (Romans 6:23),  and death is associated with hellfire and damnation.  If all men must be punished for their sins, and those sins began with Adam, then a new perfect Adam would be needed to redeem mankind from those sins. Therefore, God sent His only-begotten (monogenē) Son  in the form of Jesus of Nazareth,  who was both divine and human. Christian theology from the third century confirmed the belief that Jesus and the Father are one in essence (which is called, in Greek, homoousion, meaning ‘of the same essence’ or consubstantial).  

If Jesus’s sacrifice was once and for all time, and He was the only-begotten Son of God while being both God and man, then that would put Him on a station that is higher than Moses or any of the other Prophets,  and would also mean that His coming was once and for all time, unique and final—so there could be no significant Prophet after Him. Likewise, the prophecies of Jesus refer to the coming of the Last Day, and the writings of Paul and the other New Testament writers also reference the Last Day and Final Judgement, and they do not refer to the coming of a Prophet on a par with Jesus Christ or in any way like Jesus Christ. Thus, from the Christians perspective, Christianity is the final religion and Jesus Christ is all that anyone needs for salvation. It is important for Muslims, and others, to understand this perspective, because it explains why Christians reject Islam, the Qur’ān and the Prophet Muhammad, as well as any other Prophets that came after Him. 

The Qur’ān rejects the man-made Christian theological concept of homoousion, making a clear distinction between Jesus of Nazareth and God.  It also states that Jesus and Muhammad are both Messengers and Prophets of God and are thus the same in their nature. There is a different nature that Jesus of Nazareth possessed that the Prophet Muhammad or Moses did not possess. As we have already quoted above, God states that (2:285): ‘we make no distinction between any of His Apostles’ (mā nufarriqu bayna ’aḥad-in min rusul-i-hi).  Apostle here is meant in the original Greek sense of the word to mean ‘Messengers’ (rusul in the Arabic plural form). God does not distinguish between Abraham, Moses, Jesus or Muhammad, nor even between Zoroaster, Noah or Adam. They are all Messengers and Prophets of God. Jesus confirms this concept in the Gospels, where He says (John 5:46 – 47): ‘For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me; for he wrote of me. But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words?’  He also makes it clear that, as I noted in my article on the Meaning of the Return of Christ,  that He would be followed by another Person who would reveal a greater measure of truth than was revealed in the Gospels, i.e. the Spirit of Truth. I wrote: 

‘Secondly, Jesus did not just prophesy His second coming, He prophesied two things: firstly, that He would be followed by a Figure known as the Comforter (Paraklētos) or Spirit of Truth (Pneuma tēs Alētheias),  and, secondly that He would Return in the Glory of His Father (Doxē tou Patros Autou).  There are thus two Beings or Persons that Christians are told to expect, who will appear after Christ. Moreover, there are two Witnesses,  and three Woes,  referred to in the Book of Revelation, indicating two or three Figures who would appear.’ I moreover explained that, in the original Codex Sinaiticus, the coming of the Spirit of Truth is not equated with the Holy Spirit. Rather, He is clearly referenced as a person who will reveal things which the Twelve Apostles were not capable of hearing at the time. Thus, while the ordinary Christian interpretation is that this prophecy was fulfilled on the Pentecost, when the Holy Spirit descended upon the Christians, the reality is that this is not related to the coming of the Spirit of Truth, who is also called the ‘Comforter’. 

The Spirit of Truth is another Prophet or Messenger of God who would come after Jesus Christ and would reveal things which Christians could not bear to hear in their own generation. This indicates and confirms the concept of progressive revelation, i.e. that each revelation from God is more potent than the last and reveals a greater measure of truth. Thus, while, in His day and age, Jesus of Nazareth was the ‘way, the truth and the life’, in the time of the Spirit of Truth, the same would apply to the Spirit of Truth and the Comforter. This means that, in each day and age, that religion and that Messenger of God who came in that day and age is the only path to God for that time, and that, after Him, when the next Messenger of God appears, that new Messenger is the only path to God in His time. Each Messenger of God is essentially the same as the Messengers of God who came before Him. 

(6) The Meaning of the Last Prophet

Wadi Feiran (Paran)

‘Set forth to them the instance of the people of the city when the Sent Ones came to it—when we sent Two unto them and they charged them both with imposture - therefore with a Third we strengthened them: and they said, "Verily we are the Sent unto you of God."’ 
- Qur’ān 36:13 - 14

What then of the hadiths regarding Muhammad being the ‘Last Prophet’ and ‘Last Messenger’? If the term ‘Seal of the Prophets’, as demonstrated above, does not relate to Muhammad being the Final Prophet, and if the concept of Muhammad being the final Prophet only arose sometime after the 3rd century of the Islamic Era, what of the hadiths and other evidence that He is the Final Prophet and Messenger? And, as mentioned above, does this contradict other parts of the Qur’ān (48:23), which state that: ‘Such is God's method carried into effect of old; no change canst thou find in God's mode of dealing’.  Let us look at several of these, and then some Hadiths which contradict them. One of the most famous of these (Jami`at-Tirmidhi 3730) is where the Prophet (peace be upon Him) said to ‘Alī: ’anta min-nī bi-manzila-t-i hārūn-a min mūsā ’illā ’anna-hu lā nabīy-a ba‘dī [‘thou art from Me in the position that Aaron is from Moses, except that there is no Prophet after Me’ (my literal translation)].  Here, manzilah means degree, grade, rank; position, status, standing, or dignity.  This tradition is important in several respects. Firstly, it establishes that ‘Alī’s role, with respect to Muhammad, was in the same degree, grade or rank as that of the Prophet Aaron in relation to Muhammad. In other words, ‘Alī’s authority was divinely established, and He was second in rank only to the Prophet Himself. It also establishes that ‘Alī possessed an authority and rank bestowed by God and was thus higher in rank than any other Muslim. As Aaron was the spokesperson and second-in-command to Moses (peace be upon Him), ‘Alī was Muhammad’s appointed successor, deputy and viceregent (walī). Secondly, and most importantly in the context of this essay, it states that, literally, ‘there is no Prophet after Me [ba‘d-ī]’. However, a more appropriate translation might be ‘there is no Prophet immediately after Me’, since ba‘d means ‘then, thereupon; afterwards, later, after that, in the following; still, yet’ and thus implies that there would be no Prophet, as a successor, immediately after Muhammad. Instead, He appointed ‘Alī to be His deputy and successor, similar to Aaron in relation to Moses (peace be upon Him). The point of this Hadith is not, therefore, the finality of Islam, but the successorship and rank of ‘Alī, who, though not a Prophet, was nevertheless on a rank and authority similar to that of the Prophet Aaron. Thus, although Muhammad did not specifically leave a will or testament, He verbally appointed ‘Alī as His immediate successor—the first of the Twelve Imāms. 

What of more explicit traditions about the finality of Islam? However many one may find, none of these Hadiths actually speak of the finality of Islam. Again, as above, Muhammad says (Sahih al-Bukhari 3455): kānat ban-ū ’isrā’īl-a tasūsu-hum-u l-’anbiyā’, kullamā halaka nabīy-un khalafa-hu nabīy-un, wa-’inna-hu lā nabī-yun ba‘dī ‘The Children of Israel used to be guided by Prophets; whenever a Prophet died, another one would take over His place, and, verily, no Prophet is after Me’, i.e. Muhammad would not be succeeded by a Prophet-successor.  Instead, He says: wa-sa-yakūnu khulafā’-u fa-yakthurūna [‘and there will be deputies/successors, and they will increase (in number)’].  The verb khalafa here means to succeed, follow, come after, replace or take the place of; khulafā’ is the plural of khalīfah, usually translated as ‘caliph’, which means a vicar, deputy, or successor. 

It is very clear, therefore, that, as we discovered with the term ‘Seal of the Prophets’ above, the idea that there will be ‘no Prophet’ after Muhammad does not mean what the modern teachers and ‘ulamā’ say that it means. The Seal of the Prophets means that Muhammad is the ‘Seal’ of all the Prophets who came before Him, i.e. His revelation fulfilled all the revelations that came before it—He was the Prophet ‘like unto’ Moses (Deuteronomy 18:15),  Shiloh (Genesis 49:10),  the ‘Spirit of Truth’ (John 14:17),  and ‘Comforter’ (John 14:26),  who would come from Mount Paran (Deuteronomy 33:2),  who will bring a new Song (Isaiah 42:10),  in the Valley of Baca (Psalm 84:6),  and whose coming coincided with the first woe (Revelation 8:13),  and was one of the Two Witnesses who prophesied for 1,260 days (Revelation 11:1 – 14).  He was, moreover, Hushedar, the first of the three promised Zoroastrian Messiahs, whose birth was expected between the years 593 to 635 AD.  Moreover, Al-Mas‘údí (c. 896 – 956 AD) cited a prophecy from a lost Avestan book in which Zoroaster foretold the Persian Empire's destruction in three hundred years, and that the religion would last for a thousand years,  i.e. the conquest of Persia by Alexander in 331 BC and destruction of Persepolis in 330 BC (roughly 300 years from the Empire’s founding),  and the revelation of Muhammad (and remaining thousand years) ending in 630 AD with Muhammad’s conquest and conversion of Mecca.  If religion is revealed progressively, including the same central message, but also including a greater measure of truth with each revelation, the coming of Muhammad (peace be upon Him) represented a turning point in the spiritual evolution of mankind. The Qur’ān contains the same kernel of truth and core teaching of all the revelations that proceeded it, i.e. its moral core and the eternal divine virtues, as well as proclaiming the oneness of God, the common origin and brotherhood of mankind, the unity of all the previous religions, the belief in angels, scriptures, the resurrection, Last Day and Judgement, and the Meeting with God. In addition, the Qur’ān confirms some of the laws of previous revelations, while introducing new laws and establishing the basis of a modern nation-state and community. It thus represented the summum bonum or cynosure of religion up until that point in mankind’s evolution. Muhammad had thus sealed the revelations of the past by providing the latest chapter in the eternal Faith of God—Islām. 

At the same time, Muhammad was both the latest in a series of Prophets and Messengers of God ‘endowed with constancy’ who had brought a Book and divine Law, as well as being the return of all the Prophets who came before Him. As I explained in my article on “The Meaning of the Return of Christ”,  the concept of ‘return’ in the scriptures, like the concept of ‘resurrection’, ‘judgement’, ‘ascent’ and ‘descent’, ‘life’ and ‘death’, being ‘born again’ and ‘rebirth’, ‘hellfire’ and ‘heaven’, represents a spiritual concept, and does not refer to the physical realm of existence. Return means return of the quality, authority and type, not a return of individuality and the rational soul. In other words, each Prophet and Messenger of God is essentially one, since they are all Messengers of one King, Prophets from one God, preaching one Message, teaching one Religion, upholding one Faith, and proclaiming one Cause. The Qur’ān says (2:285): ‘The Apostle believeth in that which hath been sent down from his Lord, as do the faithful also. Each one believeth in God, and His Angels, and His Books, and His Apostles: we make no distinction between any of His Apostles’.  This verse is significant, as God says lā nufarriq-u bayna ’aḥad-in min rusul-i-hi [‘We do not distinguish between anyone among the Messengers’ (my translation)]. The verb farraqa (Form II of fariqa) means ‘to separate, part, divide, sever, sunder’ or ‘to make a distinction (bayna between), distinguish, differentiate (bayna between)’.  Thus, God is not just saying that the Messengers are all of one rank or station, but that God does not differentiate, divide or separate them. In other words, the Messengers are all essentially one, just as all the revelations of God are one in Islām. In this respect, each Messenger of God is a return of all the previous Messengers of God, and they are, in quality but not individuality, one person, one being, one Messenger. Although Jesus and Muhammad had separate personalities and rational souls, they were essentially one. Thus, Jesus is Muhammad and Muhammad is Jesus. This is confirmed in the Hadiths, as the Prophet is recorded to have said (Biḥār-u l-’Anwār, vol. 25, p. 16): ’amma n-nabīyūna fa-’anā [‘As for the Prophets, I am (they)’ (my translation)].   

Muhammad promised that two Messianic Figures would appear after Him, i.e. the Mahdī (or Qā’im) who would be a descendant of His Family, and the Return of Jesus Christ. Most Hadiths refer to these as two separate individuals, and they are two separate Figures. However, one of the Hadiths clearly states that the Mahdī and Christ are one and the same (Sunan Ibn Majah 4039): ‘Adhering to religion will only become harder and worldly affairs will only become more difficult, and people will only become more stingy, and the Hour will only come upon the worst of people, and the only Mahdi (after Muhammad (ﷺ)) is ‘Eisa bin Maryam.’  In this Hadith, Muhammad (peace be upon Him) says that wa-lā l-mahdī ’illā ‘īsā bn-u maryam-a [‘…And there is no Mahdi except Jesus Son of Mary’ (my translation)]. There is no doubt that Jesus is a Prophet and Messenger of God, and that His second coming would be after the Prophet Muhammad, so the Islamic prophecies are clear that there will be a Prophet and Messenger of God after the Prophet Muhammad. The above Hadith also confirms that the Mahdī will have the same essential quality, authority and station as Jesus Christ, meaning that the Mahdī is Himself a Prophet and Messenger of God. The Hadiths and Qur’ān also indicate that the second coming of Jesus is separate from the coming of the Mahdi. Therefore, Islamic prophecies clearly indicate that there will be two Prophets and Messengers of God after the Prophet Muhammad. 

This is confirmed by the Qur’ān itself, which relates that the Jews argued that God could not reveal any further religion, implying that God’s Hand was ‘tied up’. He says: ‘"The hand of God," say the Jews, "is chained up." Their own hands shall be chained up - and for that which they have said shall they be cursed. Nay! outstretched are both His hands! At His own pleasure does He bestow gifts’.  In other words, God cannot be stopped from revealing new revelations. Likewise, as we related above, God’s way does not change, i.e. since God has always sent revelations, He will always send revelations. This is further confirmed by Qur’ān (31:27), where He says: ‘And if all the trees on earth were pens and the ocean (were ink), with seven oceans behind it to add to its (supply), yet would not the words of God be exhausted (in the writing): for God is Exalted in Power, full of Wisdom’.  The Word of God can never be exhausted, meaning that there can be no final revelation or Book, since God’s Word can never be exhausted, completed or finalised. Rather, the Word of God is infinite and eternal. Even if God were to send an infinite number of Prophets and Messengers, there could be no complete record of His Words. The revelation of the Qur’ān, therefore, while being the summum bonum of previous revelations, was not the final Book or revelation from God, for that would contradict the above verses. The continuity of this process is confirmed in numerous divine verses, e.g. (Qur’ān 6:48): wa-mā nursil-u l-mursalīna ’illā mubashshirīna wa mundhirīna (‘And We send not the Messengers except as Bearers of Glad-Tidings and Warners’ [my translation]); (Qur’ān 7:35): yā ban-ī ādam-a ’immā ya’tiyannakum rusul-un min-kum yaquṣṣūna ʿalay-kum āyāt-ī fa-man-i ttaqā wa-’aṣlaḥa fa-lā khawf-un ʿalay-him wa lā hum yaḥzanūna [‘O Children of Adam! When a Messenger surely cometh unto you relating My Verses, then whoever fear God and do righteousness/good works, there shall be no fear upon them, and they shall not grieve’ (my translation)]; (Qur’ān 2:129): rabb-anā wa b‘ath fī-him rasūl-an min-hum yatlū ‘alay-him ’āyāt-i-ka wa yu‘allimūnu-hum l-kitāb-a wa l-ḥikma-t-a wa yuzakkī-him [‘O Our Lord! And send within them a Messenger from them (who) reciteth unto them My Verses and (who) teacheth them the Book and the Wisdom and chasteneth/purifieth them…’ (my translation)]; (Qur’ān 2:87): ’a-fa-kullumā jā’a-kum rasul-un bi-mā lā tahwā ’anfusu-kum-u stakbar-tum fa-farīq-an kadhdhab-tum wa farīq-an taqtulūna [‘For as oft a Messenger cometh unto you with what your selves/hearts desire not, ye swell with pride and a part of them ye accuse of lying/deny, and a part of them ye kill’ (my translation)].  In this latter verse (Qur’ān 2:87), the verb taqtulūna ‘ye kill’ is present indicative (al-muḍāriʿu l-marfūʿ), indicating that it is a continuous and/or future action. Likewise, the verse ’immā ya’tiyannakum rusul-un min-kum uses the nūn of emphasis (nūn-u l-tawkīd-u l-khafīfah) to state that God will certainly send Messengers from among you (Qur’ān 7:35), and wa-mā nursil-u l-mursalīna in Qur’ān 6:48 also uses the present indicative to show that God continuously sends His Messengers. If the Qur’ān is the eternal Word of God, then the meaning of this action has no cessation, and it is a continuous attribute of God, i.e. God is the Sender of the Messengers. According to the Arabic Qur’ān Corpus, the term mursil (‘Sender’), an eternal Attribute of God, appears 4 times in the Qur’ān, two of which are relevant:  

wa-lākinnā kunnā ’ansha’-nā qurūn-an fa-taṭāwala ʿalayhim-u l-ʿumur-u wa mā kunta thāwiy-an fī ahl-i madyan-a tatlū ʿalay-him āyāt-i-nā wa-lākinnā kunnā mursil-īna
‘But We raised up (new) generations, and long were the ages that passed over them; but thou wast not a dweller among the people of Madyan, rehearsing Our Signs to them; but it is We Who send apostles (with inspiration)’ (Qur’ān 28:45);  

’amr-an min ‘ind-i-nā—’innā kunnā mursilīna!
‘By command, from Our Presence. For We (ever) send (revelations)’ (Qur’ān 44:5). 

In both of these verses, God gives us His Name, the Sender (al-mursil), and clearly states that He is the Sender of revelations, that this is an eternal and never-changing attribute of God, and that He will forever continue to send revelations. Here God says ’innā kunnā mursalīna meaning ‘We, verily, are the Sender’,  with ’innā being an emphatic or assertive particle meaning ‘We, verily’ (comprising ’inna ‘verily’ and the -nā ‘we’ suffix) and kunnā, which is used here to describe a state of being (from kāna ‘to be’ and the same ‘we’ suffix). This is the ‘royal’ or ‘divine’ We which is often used in the Qur’ān to indicate the majesty and greatness of God, which is why mursil ‘Sender’ is in the plural form.  The meaning of this verse is clear—Sender is an eternal state of being of God, so God has always been a Sender and will continue to be a Sender. This would not be the case if there were a last or final Prophet. Any interpretation of the Qur’ān or the Hadiths which contradicts this concept is thus null and void. God’s revelation is continuous, never-ending and cannot be final. To say that any one revelation from God is final, or that religion or Islām can be final, would be a grave departure from the clear meaning of these verses cited above. Moreover, there are numerous verses which indicate that people will meet their Lord (i.e. the Meeting with God) in the Day of God, which relates to the coming of the Return of Christ in the Glory of His Father, as promised in the Gospels. We will deal with the meaning of the ‘Meeting with God’ below.

As previously indicated, furthermore, the Muhammadan Dispensation has a beginning, and it has an end. Dispensation (Arabic dawr) here means an era or time period in which the law and teachings of a Revelation apply. Thus, from the Revelation of Abraham in the second millennium BC (1922 BC according to Ussher’s chronology) until the Revelation of Moses, the Law and Teachings of Abraham applied to the Hebrews, which included the Children of Israel (the Israelites). And from the Revelation of Moses on Mount Sinai (which, according to Ussher’s chronology, happened in 1491 BC) until the Revelation of Jesus Christ (i.e. 27 AD according to Ussher, or the 15th year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar according to Luke 3:1 – 2, which is roughly 28 – 29 AD) —a period of just over 1,500 years, the law of Moses contained in the Torah was the Law of God for the Israelites (including the Jews and Samaritans). This includes the Ten Commandments, as well as the rest of the 613 mitzvot (commandments) contained in the first Five Book of the Bible (also called the Pentateuch). 

The Revelation of Moses was intended specifically for the Israelites and the Land of Israel, not for other peoples. Therefore, it overlaps with some other Dispensations. For example, the Revelation of Zoroaster occurred, according to Xanthos of Lydia, some 600 years before Xerxes’ invasion of Greece in 480 BC, i.e. in the year 1080 BC.  The Christian Dispensation began circa 28/29 AD and ended in 610 AD. Unlike previous Dispensations, the Gospel of Jesus Christ was intended for all mankind, and, therefore, both the Mosaic and Zoroastrian Dispensations ended with the coming of Jesus Christ. The Prophet Muhammad received His Revelation in the year 610 AD. This brought to an end the Christian Dispensation (c. 29 AD – 610 AD) and began the Muhammadan Dispensation. In a narrow sense, one could also call this the Islamic Dispensation, or perhaps the Qur’ānic Dispensation. Like the Gospels, the Qur’ān was intended for all mankind, and was the second universal Revelation in the history of mankind, as God says (Qur’ān 34:28): ‘And We have not sent thee (O Muhammad) save as a Bringer of good tidings and a Warner unto all mankind [li-n-nās]; but most of mankind know not’;  and (Qur’ān 21:107): mā ’arsal-nā-ka ’illā raḥmat-an li-l-‘ālamīna [‘We have not sent Thee except as a Mercy for [all] the worlds’ (my translation)].  Thus, the Message of Muhammad and the Qur’ān was intended for all mankind (an-nās) and Muhammad Himself was sent as Mercy from God for all beings, and for all mankind. The Qur’ān, likewise, is the Book of God for all mankind, as He says (Qur’ān 14:1): ‘Alif. Lam. Ra. (This is) a Scripture which We have revealed unto thee (Muhammad) that thereby thou mayst bring forth mankind from darkness unto light, by the permission of their Lord, unto the path of the Mighty, the Owner of Praise’.  

The traditions (Hadiths) of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon Him) clearly indicate that the Muhammadan Dispensation has a fixed end-date, i.e. the date after which the laws of the Qur’ān no longer apply and a new Revelation and new Law comes into force, with a new Messenger of God, new Law and new Book. Muhammad emphasised that, just like the Jews and Christians before-time, Muslims would forget the true meaning and purpose of the Qur’ān, saying (according to Sunan Ibn Majah 4048) ‘That will be at the time when knowledge (of Qur’ān) disappears’, noting ‘Is it not the case that these Jews and Christians read the Tawrah and the Injil, but they do not act upon anything of what is in them?’ Thus, it is not that the Qur’ān will no longer be present, but that people will not understand its inner meanings and true Message and, due to scriptural literalism, will reject the Truth when it appears. We should expect, therefore, that the majority of the followers of Muhammad, including the ‘ulamā’ would fail to recognise the Truth.  

As Imām Hasan al-‘Askarī said (Biḥār-u l-’Anwār, vol. 52, p. 363): idhā ẓaharat rāya-t-u l-ḥaqq-i la‘ana-hu ’ahl-u sh-sharq-u wa l-gharb [‘When the banner/standard of the Truth/the True One is made manifest, the people(s) of the East and the West shall curse it’ (my translation)].  In other words, when the Mahdī (or Qā’im) appears, the Promised One of Islām, He will be opposed by the peoples of both the East and the West, including the Islamic world and the ‘ulamā’. Indeed, in the same Hadith, al-‘Askarī says that, in opposing the Qā’im, fa-yata’awwalūna ‘alay-hi kitāb-a llāh-i wa yuqātilūna-hu ‘alay-hi [‘and they will (mis)interpret the Book of God against Him and they will fight Him over it’ (my translation)].  In other words, they will interpret the Qur’ān literally in order to oppose the Qā’im. This implies that the Qā’im will appear in a way that is not expected by Muslims and which does not conform to the standard or literal reading of the Qur’ān. In other words, He will appear, as in previous dispensations, as an ordinary Man, and be opposed for the same reasons that the Jews, Christians and polytheists rejected Muhammad, the Jews rejected Jesus, the karapans (priests of the old religion) rejected Zoroaster, and Pharoah rejected Moses (peace be upon them). 

His proof will not be miracles and a physical sovereignty, but revelation of divine verses and spiritual power. This is made even clearer in the following tradition from Imām Muhammad al-Bāqir (upon whom be peace), who said (Biḥār al-Anwār, vol. 52, p. 354): yaqūm-u l-qā’im-u bi-’amr-in jadīd-in, wa kitāb-in jadīd-in [‘The Qā’im shall arise with a new Cause and a new Book’ (my translation)].  The words ’amr jadīd ‘new Cause’ imply a new ‘Faith’ or new ‘religion’, and kitāb jadīd ‘a new Book’ imply a new Revelation on a par with the Qur’ān. 

Muhammad (peace be upon Him) also said that the sacred land of Mecca (or perhaps the Hijāz) would remain sacred until the end of the Dispensation. He said (Sunan an-Nasa’i 2874): ‘Allah made this land sacred the day He created the Heavens and the Earth, so it is sacred by the Decree of Allah until the day of Resurrection’.  This implies that, after the Day of Resurrection, Mecca would no longer be ‘sacred’. Similarly, He said (Jami` at-Tirmidhi 2202): ‘When the sword is imposed on my Ummah, it shall not be removed from it until the Day of Resurrection’.  This implies that, at the end of the Muhammadan Dispensation, holy war would be abolished. Even more clearly, the Prophet stated (Sahih Muslim 1822a): ‘The Islamic religion will continue until the Hour has been established, or you have been ruled over by twelve Caliphs, all of them being from the Quraish’.  This is a remarkable Hadith, because it is quite clear in saying that the Dispensation established by Muhammad would end. In the Arabic, it says: lā yazālu d-dīn-u qā’im-an ḥattā taqūm-a s-sā‘a-t-u ’aw yakūna ‘alay-kum-u thna ‘ashar-a khalīfa-t-an kull-u-hum min quraysh.  This is a remarkable Hadith because it clearly anticipates the end of the Dispensation of Muhammad, here referred to as ad-dīn (‘the Faith’ or ‘the Religion’). 

Lest there be any confusion, other versions of this Hadith use the terms al-’islām (‘Islam’),  al-’amr (the Cause)  or hādha d-dīn (this Religion). The verb lā yazālu means ‘will continue’ and qā’im-an here means ‘existing, existent’ or ‘evident, visible, conspicuous, established’.  In the context, this implies that the Faith or Religion (i.e. the Muhammadan Faith) will continue to exist or be established ḥattā ‘until’ taqūm-a s-sā‘a-t-u ‘the Hour comes to pass/takes place’. Both qā’im and taqūm derive from the root qāma ‘to get up, stand up; to come to pass, take place’.  The ‘Hour’ here refers to the coming of the Day of Judgement, the Resurrection, and the Meeting with God. This begins with the coming of al-Mahdī (the ‘Rightly-Guided One’) who, as mentioned above, is a Messenger of God and Prophet of the lineage of the Prophet Muhammad (and thus a member of the Quraysh tribe). He is also called al-Qā’im (‘He Who ariseth’). It is clear that the Qā’im will abrogate the law of the Qur’ān and establish an independent and new Revelation, thus beginning a new religious dispensation. 

The phrase ’aw yakūna ‘alay-kum-u thna ‘ashar-a khalīfa-t-an kull-u-hum min quraysh means ‘or there are (upon you) twelve deputies/viceregents/caliphs—all of them from Quraysh’. There were four ‘rightly-guided Caliphs’ following the death of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon Him), followed by 14 Umayyad Caliphs and 37 ‘Abbasid Caliphs, all from the Quraysh, so this cannot be referring to those 3 groups of Caliphs. Rather, the 12 ‘caliphs’ or ‘deputies’ here refer to the Twelve Imāms who descended from the line of Fātimah, beginning with ‘Alī ibn Abī Tālib (c. 600 – 661 AD), the son-in-law and cousin of the Prophet Muhammad, and ending with the Mahdī/Qā’im (who was born in 1819 AD). The 11th Imām, Hasan ibn ‘Alī al-‘Askarī (upon whom be peace), died on 1 January 874 AD, or 8th Rabī‘ al-’Awwal 260 AH (i.e. 260 years after the Hijrah of the Prophet Muhammad). God says, in the Qur’ān (32:5): ‘He governs the affair from the heaven unto the earth; then shall it ascend to him in a day, the measure of which is as a thousand years of what ye number’.  In other words, God will guide mankind for a period of time on Earth through the Prophet and His eleven immediate successors, the Imāms, for a period of 260 lunar years. Then ‘shall it ascend to him in a day, the measure of which is as a thousand years of what ye number’,  meaning that the world will be bereft of direct divine guidance for a period of 1,000 lunar years, i.e. from 260 AH to 1260 AH, which is equivalent to 1844 AD. 

The Islamic year 1260 AH would be the year in which the Twelfth Imām, al-Mahdī, or al-Qā’im, would appear from the line of the Prophet, of the tribe of the Quraysh. When He appears, as the Prophet Muhammad indicates above, the Islamic religion (i.e. the Muhammadan Dispensation) would end, the previous Cause of God or Faith of God would no longer be established, and a new Revelation and new Faith would begin. This was fulfilled in the Person of Sayyid ‘Alī-Muhammad Shīrāzī, known as “the Báb”. Two hours and eleven minutes after midnight on Wednesday, 22 May 1844 AD (5 Jumāda l-’Awwal 1260 AH), the Báb inaugurated a new Dispensation, the Bábí Dispensation, by declaring to His first disciple that He was the Gate of God. The Bábí Dispensation lasted 19 years, until the Declaration of Bahá’u’lláh on Wednesday, 22 April 1863 AD (3 Dhu l-Qa‘dah 1279 AD). Bahá’u’lláh is the Return of Jesus Christ. For more information on how Bahá’u’lláh fulfils the Biblical prophecies of the Return of Christ, see my previous article on this topic,  or Thief in the Night: The Case of the Missing Millennium by William Sears.  The Declaration of the Báb and the Declaration of Bahá’u’lláh are both associated with ‘the Hour’ and the ‘Day of Judgement’, and the ‘Resurrection’, all of which have spiritual and symbolic meanings, as they are mutashābihāt ‘ambiguous’ or ‘metaphorical’ concepts. For more information on the inner meaning of these concepts, I would suggest reading the Book of Certitude (The Kitáb-i-Íqán) of Bahá’u’lláh.  


- Abú-Jalál