Showing posts with label Biblical prophecy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Biblical prophecy. Show all posts

Tuesday, 31 March 2026

The Meaning of the Seal of the Prophets (part 3 of 3)

Abú-Jalál

31 March 2026


(7) The Prophetic Cycle inaugurated by Adam

Progressive revelation

‘And we sent none, previous to thee, but men to whom we had revealed ourselves. Ask ye the people who are warned by Scriptures, if ye know it not

We gave them not bodies which could dispense with food: and they were not to live for ever.’ 

- Qur’ān 21:7 – 8 


The Bible and the Qur’ān are agreed that the first Man was named Adam, and that Adam spoke with God, i.e. He was a Prophet. While the Qur’ān does not give a timeframe for when Adam lived, He appears in a sequence of Prophets, followed by Noah. The Bible, through its genealogies, gives a chronology of when Adam would have lived. According to Ussher, Adam was born in 4004 BC, which was based on a backwards calculation from the accession of the Babylonian king Amel-Marduk in 562 BC and an estimate that Christ was born in 5 BC and no later than 4 BC.  The Jewish Anno Mundi calendar starts in a later year, i.e. the year 3761 BC, while the Creation Era of Constantinople begins further back, with Year One being 5509 BC, the difference being that the former is based on the Masoretic text of the Old Testament and the latter on the Septuagint.  Another possibility is that Adam was born circa 3,959 BC, 3954 BC,  3,899 BC or other estimates. In any case, the time period from Adam to the present day is a period of roughly six thousand years. Within that time period, there were at least nine major religions which still exist (e.g. Hinduism, Sabianism, Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Buddhism, Christianity, Islam, and the Bábí and Bahá’í Faiths), and numerous others that are lost to the sands of time (see the chart above). This six-thousand-year period can be called the ‘Prophetic Cycle’ or the ‘Adamic Cycle’, since it began with Adam.  


While traditional Islamic belief holds that Muhammad is the final Prophet and that there can be no Prophet after Him, a different view was taken by Shaykh Ahmad al-Ahsā’ī (1753 - 1826), the founder of the Shaykhi School of Islām. According to Rafati (1979), Shaykhī belief held that ‘a prophetic cycle began with Adam and continued to the Prophet Muḥammad. During this Adamic cycle, six major prophets appeared: Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and Muḥammad.  While most Muslims believe that Muḥammad was the last Prophet, Shaykh Aḥmad maintains that he was the last Prophet only within this cycle… Shaykh Aḥmad’s view of Muḥammad as the final only within the Adamic cycle implies a continuing divine revelation through a succession of prophets in a series of cycles; while each cycle has a beginning and an end, the cyclic process itself is progressive and continuous.’  Furthermore, Shaykhīs believed that ‘the appearance of the Qā’im is the Day of Judgment. Thus, to say that Islam will last until the Day of Judgment is true in the sense that Islam will last until the Qā’im appears…   


Rafati further explains that: ‘In the Day of Judgment as understood by Shaykh Aḥmad, revolutions, changes, and transformations will take place, but not in the way that people literally understand from the text. In this interpretation of the Day of Judgment, Shaykh Aḥmad attempts to reconcile intellect and revelation. The universe will not come to an end on the Day of Judgment; it has always existed and will continue to exist forever. What the Day of Judgment truly means is the advent of a new manifestation of God which puts an end to the course of its previous dispensation and opens a new cycle for human beings. As the Day of the advent of the promised Qā’im, the Day of Judgment will bring about changes in the social, moral, and religious life of the people; the values that have been applied for centuries will change, the principles and teachings of the previous religion will change, and a profound revolution will take place in all the various aspects of man’s activities’.  The ‘Meeting with God’, moreover, is also to be understood in this context. Rafati writes that ‘he interprets the meeting with God described in the Qur’ān as “seeing” God with the heart. Seeing God would not be visually beholding God’s Essence, but rather seeing God’s manifestation. This is possible when man’s heart has faith in Him, His actions, works, and teachings… As for seeing God on the Day of Judgment, Shaykh Ahmad has another interpretation. As previously stated, on the basis of the Islamic Traditions, Shaykh Ahmad interprets the Day of Judgement as the Day of the advent of the expected Qā’im’.  In other words, the coming of the Qā’im is the Day of Judgement, and the Qā’im Himself is a ‘Manifestation of God’. By attaining unto the presence of the Qā’im and believing Him, one has attained unto the presence of God and the ‘Meeting with God’ promised in the Qur’ān. 


The teachings of these various Prophets and Messengers of God were revealed to numerous peoples and nations. In the time of Adam, religion was in the form of a seed. While the core of religion does not change, the teachings are revealed progressively over time as humanity develops. When Adam appeared in the 4th or 5th millennium BC, humanity was just beginning to develop civilization.  Agriculture had begun, writing was being formed, and the first cities were beginning to develop. Thus, one of Adam’s sons, Cain, was a tiller of the soil, whereas another son, Abel, was a pastoralist. Cain murdered Abel and, due to the prohibition of murder, Cain was exiled for this crime.  Each subsequent revelation introduced more advanced teachings, greater spiritual understandings, and new laws and practices.  For example, Noah introduced the Noahide laws, also called the Noachian Laws or the ‘Seven Laws of Noah’.  Abraham introduced other laws, including circumcision.  Nevertheless, in His time, it was still permitted to marry one’s half-sister. He also appears to have abolished human sacrifice. Moses introduced a much more comprehensive system of laws, in the Torah, and Jesus abolished some of these while introducing other laws, such as a prohibition on divorce.  Even within His Dispensation, the Apostles permitted Gentiles to become Christians without the need for circumcision and removed prohibitions on eating certain foods.  


In the Qur’ān, Muhammad confirmed some of the laws of the Torah, while abolishing others and introducing new laws.  Thus, each Messenger of God changed the laws and teachings of the past, introducing new ones and bringing a greater and greater measure of truth. Muhammad sealed this six-thousand-year period of prophecy and revelation.  In doing so, He anticipated the coming of the Qā’im, who would be His own descendant  and would open up a new cycle of fulfilment.  The Prophetic Cycle, therefore, would end with Muhammad’s Dispensation, and was ‘sealed’ by Muhammad as the ‘Seal of the Prophets’,  and the Qā’im would open up the new Cycle of Fulfilment—or, rather, the Qā’im would be the midway point, the Primal Point, between the two Cycles. The new Cycle, which would also embrace the Dispensation of the Qā’im, would be inaugurated by the Return of Christ, who would be the great Prophet and Messenger whose coming would fulfil all the religions of the past, and would usher in a new age that would eventually bring about the unity of mankind under the shadow of true Islām. The Qā’im and Promised One of Islām is Sayyid ‘Alī-Muhammad Shīrāzī, known as the Báb (the ‘Gate’), and the Return of Christ and Promised One of All Religions is Mīrzā Husayn-‘Alī Nūrī, known as Bahá’u’lláh (the ‘Splendour of God’ or ‘Glory of God’). 


(8) The Meaning of Meeting with God



Bahá’u’lláh’s tent (tabernacle), which He raised on Mount Carmel 

‘…Who bear in mind that they shall meet their Lord, and that unto Him shall they return.’ 
- Qur’ān 2:46 
As mentioned above, the Qur’ān promises that the believers will meet with their Lord. This is despite the fact that God is not corporeal—He has no Body, no features, no shape or appearance. Moreover, God is exalted above ascent and descent, egress and regress, time and space, and has neither beginning nor end. Nevertheless, the Qur’ān says that He has a Face and Hands,  and that the believers will meet their Lord and enter His presence in Paradise. This is a spiritual mystery, and these verses are mutashābihāt ‘ambiguous’ or ‘metaphorical’.  As Rafati (1979) explains above, one of the great Islamic clerics, Shaykh Ahmad al-Ahsā’ī, the greatest Islamic scholar of the 18th and early 19th centuries, whose inspiration came directly from the Imāms who appeared to him in dreams and visions,  explained that the meaning of both the Day of Judgment and the ‘Meeting with God’ as meaning the coming of the Qā’im and attainment and recognition of Him. Shaykh Ahmad’s authority derived, primarily, from his spiritual insight, which allowed him to understand the mutashābihāt of the Qur’ān and the holy Traditions of the Prophet and the Imāms—and that spiritual insight and inspiration came directly from the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and the Imāms (peace be upon them) who appeared to him in dreams and visions.  He later wrote (in the Sharh-u l-Fawā’id): ‘The ulama derive their knowledge (taḥqīqāt ʿulūmihim) one from the other, but I have never followed in their way. I have derived what I know from the Imāms of guidance, and error cannot find its way into my words, since all that I confirm in my books is from them and they are preserved (maʿsūm) from sin and ignorance and error. Whoseover derives [his knowledge] from them shall not err, inasmuch as he is following them’.  In addition to being divinely-inspired, the Shaykh’s teachings also accord with reason and make sense, being a rational interpretation of the Qur’ān’s inner teachings, and the inner meanings of the Word of God. 

The Qur’ān states that the believers are those ‘who bear in mind that they shall meet their Lord, and that unto Him shall they return’ (2:46),  ‘and fear ye God, and know that ye must meet Him; and bear these good tidings to the faithful’ (2:223);  ‘But they who held it as certain that they must meet God, said, "How oft, by God's will, hath a small host vanquished a numerous host! and God is with the steadfastly enduring"’ (2:249);  ‘Lost are they who deny the meeting with God until "the Hour" cometh suddenly upon them!’ (6:31);  ‘He who hopes for the meeting of God,- verily, God's appointed time will come; and He both hears and knows’ (29:5);  ‘And those who disbelieve in God's signs and in meeting with Him, these shall despair of my mercy; and these, for them is grievous woe’ (29:23);  ‘On that day shall faces beam with light, outlooking towards their Lord’ (75:22 – 23).  We also know that He has a ‘Face’, e.g. He says: ‘There is no god but He. Everything (that exists) will perish except His own Face’ (28:88);  and ‘But the face of thy Lord shall abide resplendent with majesty and glory’ (55:27).  Likewise, He has ‘Hands’, as in Qur’ān 5:64: ‘The Jews say: "God's hand is tied up." Be their hands tied up and be they accursed for the (blasphemy) they utter. Nay, both His hands are widely outstretched’.  Yet we know that God cannot be seen, because He says (6:103): ‘No vision taketh in Him, but He taketh in all vision: and He is the Subtile, the All-informed’,  meaning that He is beyond vision or comprehension and does not exist in a visible or physical form. 

This is confirmed in Qur’ān 7:143, where Moses asked to behold God face-to-face: ‘When Moses came to the place appointed by Us, and his Lord addressed him, He said: "O my Lord! show (Thyself) to me, that I may look upon thee." God said: "By no means canst thou see Me (direct); But look upon the mount; if it abide in its place, then shalt thou see Me." When his Lord manifested His glory on the Mount, He made it as dust. And Moses fell down in a swoon. When he recovered his senses he said: "Glory be to Thee! to Thee I turn in repentance, and I am the first to believe"’.  This is despite the fact that, elsewhere, we are told that Moses did see God ‘face-to-face’, as in Exodus 33:11, where God says: ‘And the LORD spake unto Moses face to face, as a man speaketh unto his friend’.  However, this is clarified in Exodus 33:20, where God says: ‘And he said, Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live’,  and Exodus 33:23: ‘I will take away mine hand, and thou shalt see my back parts: but my face shall not be seen’.  This indicates that God both can and cannot be seen, so there must be a dual meaning to ‘seeing God’. In the literal sense, nobody can see God ‘and live’,  as in the example of when God showed Himself to the mountain and it turned to dust.   What we know is that Moses did encounter God on Mount Sinai and attained God’s presence at the Burning Bush, and He heard the voice of God. All of these things refer to the Word of God that is revealed through Moses. Moses Himself was a Primal Mirror of God, being a perfect, stainless mirror who embodied and reflected all the Names and Attributes of God, making Him a pure vessel for God’s Will and purpose. As such, Moses was a ‘Manifestation of God’. Just as Moses ‘saw God’ through His inner self, which is the Mirror of God, and through which His Light and Word (Logos) is made manifest, so, likewise, the Israelites encountered God through Moses, since, by attaining the presence of Moses, they attained the presence of God, and through listening to the Word of Moses, they heard the Word of God, because Moses was the Mouthpiece of God and the Manifestation of His Primal Will on Earth. 

The ’Meeting with God’ is explained by Bahá’u’lláh in the Kitáb-i-Iqán: ‘For the highest and most excelling grace bestowed upon men is the grace of “attaining unto the Presence of God” and of His recognition, which has been promised unto all people. This is the utmost degree of grace vouchsafed unto man by the All-Bountiful, the Ancient of Days, and the fulness of His absolute bounty upon His creatures… This people have repudiated all these verses, that unmistakably testify to the reality of “attainment unto the Divine Presence.” No theme hath been more emphatically asserted in the holy scriptures. Notwithstanding, they have deprived themselves of this lofty and most exalted rank, this supreme and glorious station…’  He clarifies that, by “attainment unto the Divine Presence” is meant recognising and attaining the presence of the Prophets who are endowed with constancy—the Manifestations of God. Bahá’u’lláh explains that ‘These Prophets and chosen Ones of God are the recipients and revealers of all the unchangeable attributes and names of God. They are the mirrors that truly and faithfully reflect the light of God. Whatsoever is applicable to them is in reality applicable to God, Himself, Who is both the Visible and the Invisible. The knowledge of Him, Who is the Origin of all things, and attainment unto Him, are impossible save through knowledge of, and attainment unto, these luminous Beings who proceed from the Sun of Truth. By attaining, therefore, to the presence of these holy Luminaries, the “Presence of God” Himself is attained. From their knowledge, the knowledge of God is revealed, and from the light of their countenance, the splendour of the Face of God is made manifest. Through the manifold attributes of these Essences of Detachment, Who are both the first and the last, the seen and the hidden, it is made evident that He Who is the Sun of Truth is “the First and the Last, the Seen, and the Hidden.”  Likewise the other lofty names and exalted attributes of God. Therefore, whosoever, and in whatever Dispensation, hath recognized and attained unto the presence of these glorious, these resplendent and most excellent Luminaries, hath verily attained unto the “Presence of God” Himself, and entered the city of eternal and immortal life. Attainment unto such presence is possible only in the Day of Resurrection, which is the Day of the rise of God Himself through His all-embracing Revelation’

Attainment of the Presence of God, therefore, and Meeting with the Lord, refer to the coming of the Manifestation of God in the Day of Resurrection, and the Day of Resurrection means, according to Bahá’u’lláh, when God comes ‘down to them overshadowed with clouds’, i.e. the coming of the Manifestation of God. The Qur’ān (2:210) says: hal yanẓurūna ’illā ’an ya’tiya-hum-u llāh-u fī ẓulal-in min-a l-ghamām-i wa l-malā’ika-t-u wa quḍiya l-’amr-u wa ’ila llāh-i tarju‘u l-’umūr [‘And are they contemplating/observing until that God cometh in the canopies of the clouds and the Angels, and the Cause/religion is ended/consummated, and to God return all things/affairs/causes’ (my literal translation)]. This is often translated as if it is a hypothetical. However, Shoghi Effendi translates the first part of this verse, hal yanẓurūna ’illā ’an ya’tiya-hum-u llāh-u fī ẓulal-in min-a l-ghamām-i as ‘What can such expect but that God should come down to them overshadowed with clouds’ which Bahá’u’lláh cites as a sign of the Day of Resurrection and referring to the coming of the Qā’im. The phrase quḍiya l-’amr-u ‘the Cause is ended’ refers to the consummation, end and fulfilment of the Cause of God, i.e. His religious Dispensation.  When God comes in the clouds of heaven, the ’Amr (Cause/Affair) or Dīn (Faith) is fulfilled and consummated, and the religious dispensation ends, in this case the Muhammadan Dispensation ends with the coming of the Qā’im, i.e. the Báb. The phrase, wa ’ila llāh-i tarju‘u l-’umūr, is translated by Yusuf Ali as ‘to God do all questions go back (for decision)’ and by Rodwell as ‘And to God shall all things return’, but I would argue that al-’umūr here, which is the plural of ’amr, can refer to all the religious dispensations returning to God, who is their Origin, implying that every ’amr (‘Cause’, ‘Affair’), including the religion and dispensation of Muhammad, must have an end, and will return to God, Who is its origin and Creator. This demonstrates the finality of the religion of the Qur’ān.  

This coming of the Lord in the clouds is also anticipated in the Bible. The Prophet Daniel wrote (7:13): ‘I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man [kə-ḇar ’ĕ-nāš] came with the clouds of heaven [‘im-‘ă-nā-nê šə-may-yā], and came to the Ancient of days [‘at-tîq yō-w-may-yā], and they brought him near before him’.  While the Qur’ān says that Allāh (God) will come in the canopies of the clouds,  the Prophet Daniel says that it is Bar ’Enāsh (the Son of Man), who comes before ‘Attîq Yōwmayyā (the Ancient of Days), who will come in the clouds of heaven. Speaking of the Return of Christ, Jesus said (Matthew 24:30): ‘And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory’‘Son of Man’ was a title used by Jesus Christ to refer to Himself. It is clear, then, that it is not the Essence of Allāh that will come in the clouds; rather, this is a reference to the coming of the Manifestation of God, who is His Perfect Mirror, i.e. the Messenger of God who comes with a Book. Just as Jesus came in the clouds of heaven when He was born of Mary, so will He return in the clouds of heaven, even as He said (John 6:38): ‘For I have come down from heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me’.  This indicates that Jesus came down from heaven the first time, not just when He returns in a future time. 

The Return of Christ would come in the same way as His first coming, i.e. down from heaven and with the clouds of heaven. The ‘clouds’ here refer to His Body, because a cloud blocks out the sun, just as the Body of Christ prevents us from seeing His nature, and His nature is that He is a Perfect Mirror of God and the Manifestation of the Logos (Word), which is the Primal Will of God. The Qur’ān itself identifies Jesus with this Primal Will, saying (Qur’ān 3:45): ’inna llāh-a yubashshir-u-ki bi-kalima-t-in min-hu sm-u-hu l-masīh-u ‘īsā bn-u maryam-a [‘Verily, God giveth glad-tidings/good news to thee (fem.) of a Word from Him—His Name is Christ/the Messiah Jesus, Son of Mary’ (my translation)].  Here Jesus is described as the Messiah and as a Manifestation of the Creative Word and Primal Will of God. A kalimah is literally a ‘word’, and here that Word comes ‘from Him’ (i.e. from God), meaning that the Primal Will of God proceeds from God (the Father), which accords with Jesus’s statement (John 14:10): ‘Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works’.  This indicates that Jesus Christ is a vessel for God’s Will and purpose, and that He is a Primal Mirror of God and Mouthpiece for His Word. By turning to Jesus Christ, we are turning to God, just as by turning to Muhammad, one is turning to God, because both Jesus and Muhammad are Primal Mirrors of God and Manifestations of His Primal Will. They appear in the ‘clouds of heaven’ because they have physical bodies, and those clouds block out the glory and majesty of Jesus and Muhammad, who are both the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End, because they are Manifestations of God (Allah). 

In the Gospel of Mark (14:62), Jesus is asked whether He is the Messiah (Christ), ‘the Son of the Blessed’  and He replied: ‘I am: and ye shall see [opsesthe] the Son of man [ton Huion tou anthrōpou] sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven [nephelōn tou ouranou]’.  This sounds like a future promise, since opsesthe is future indicative second person plural. However, in the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus says (Matthew 26:64): ‘Hereafter [ap’ arti] shall ye see [opsesthe] the Son of man sitting [kathēmenon] on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven’Aparti (apo + arti) literally means ‘from now’ or ‘from now on’ or ‘already’. One could thus translate this as saying ‘Already you see the Son of Man sitting on the right hand of power and coming with the clouds of heaven’. Both kathēmenon ‘sitting’ and erchomenon ‘coming’ are present participles. Thus, even while Jesus was standing before the Jewish Sanhedrin before they condemned Him to death, in the utmost poverty and abasement, He was, even at that moment, sitting at the right hand of God and coming in the clouds of heaven. This indicates the spiritual sovereignty of Christ and His power, as well as how He was veiled by the clouds, i.e. His physical body, which prevented the High Priest and others from recognising Him. In like manner, the Meeting with God and the coming of the Qā’im and Return of Christ, the two Messianic Figures promised in the Qur’ān and Hadiths, are one and the same, as is the descent of Allah (God) in the clouds of heaven promised in the Surah of Baqarah in the Qur’ān. All of these refer to one spiritual reality, which is the coming of the two Promised Ones of Islām, who are the Báb and Bahá’u’lláh. 

The Báb is the Qā’im or Mahdī promised in the Hadiths, and Bahá’u’lláh is the expected Return of Christ. While all Prophets are the Return of all Prophets, and thus Muhammad, the Báb and Bahá’u’lláh can all be called the ‘Return of Christ’, Bahá’u’lláh came with a Revelation at the plenitude of splendour, intended for the collective maturity of the human race, and providing the teachings that will  bring out the unification of all mankind in one universal Cause (’amr) and one common Law/Faith (sharī‘ah),  i.e. the Bahá’í Faith. Thus, while Jesus is called Bar ’Enāsh (the Son of Man) and Huios tou Eulogētou (the Son of the Beloved), Bahá’u’lláh is called ‘Attîq Yōwmayyā (the Ancient of Days), who comes ‘with power and great glory’ (meta dynameōs kai doxēs pollēs).  He it is whom the Qur’ān describes as yad‘u d-dā‘ī ’ilā shay’-in nukur, ‘the Summoner’ who ‘shall summon to a stern business’ (Qur’ān 54:6),  the ‘Great Announcement’ (an-naba’u l-‘aẓīm) (Qur’ān 78:2),  jā’a rabb-u-ka wa l-malak-u ṣaff-an ṣaff-an, ‘thy Lord’ Who shall come with ‘the angels, rank on rank’ (Qur’ān 89:22),  and wajh-u rabb-i-ka dhu l-jalāl-i wa l-ikrām, the ‘Countenance of thy Lord of Might and Glory’ (Qur’ān 55:27).  For more on this, see Muhammad Mustafa’s (1993) Bahá’u’lláh: The Great Announcement of the Qur’an.   To sum up, the Meeting with God in the Qur’ān means, in its general sense, the coming of any Manifestation of God, including Jesus and Muhammad, but more specifically refers to the coming of the Qā’im/Mahdī, i.e. the Báb (1819 – 1850), and the coming of the Return of Christ, i.e. Bahá’u’lláh (1817 – 1892), both of whom are Messengers of God and Prophets who are ‘endowed with constancy’ (’ūlū l-‘aẓm-i) (Qur’ān 46:35).  

(9) Conclusion—Bahá’u’lláh is Come

The Garden of Ridvān, frequented by Bahá’u’lláh 


‘He had seen Him [i.e. Gabriel, the Holy Spirit] also another time [nazla-t-an ’ukhrā, lit. ‘a second descent’], near the Sidrah-tree, which marks the boundary,  [sidra-t-i l-muntahā, i.e. the Tree beyond which there is no passing, here signifying Bahá’u’lláh], near which is the garden of repose [janna-t-u ma’āwā, ‘the Garden of the Habitation/Dwelling/Abode/Resting-Place/Refuge’,  i.e. the Presence of Bahá’u’lláh].  When the Sidrah-tree was covered with what covered it [i.e. it was veiled, meaning by the physical body of Bahá’u’lláh], His [i.e. Muhammad’s] eye turned not aside, nor did it wander! For he saw the greatest of the signs of his Lord [āyāt-i rabb-i-hi l-kubrā, lit. ‘the greatest verses/signs of His Lord’, meaning the Revelation of Bahá’u’lláh)]!’ 

- Qur’ān 53:13 – 18 


The sum of all of the above in this article is that there is ultimately only one religion,  which is progressively revealed to mankind (called al-’islām [Submission (to God)], al-’amr [the Cause/Affair/Matter] or ad-dīn [the Faith/Religion] in the Qur’ān),  that this process has neither beginning nor end,  that no religion or revelation is final,  that the Word of God can never be exhausted,  that each Prophet who comes with a Book starts a new religious dispensation (meaning the time period when the laws and teachings of that Book are in force),  that every religious dispensation and revelation is complete and perfected in and of itself,  that there has been a 6,000-year-long Prophetic Cycle that was inaugurated by the Prophet Adam (peace be upon Him) and ended or sealed by the Prophet Muhammad (upon whom be peace),  that Jesus Christ (peace be upon Him) brought the first truly universal religious dispensation,  that Muhammad’s dispensation was also universal and intended for all mankind,  that Muhammad came as a Mercy for all mankind,  that the Qur’ān is the infallible Word of God for all mankind, that Muhammad emphasised that He would not be succeeded immediately by a Prophet,  but instead by 12 deputies or ‘caliphs’ (also called the Twelve Imāms),  that His religion would stand and be in force until the Day of Judgment,  that the Day of Judgment means the coming of the Qā’im or Mahdī (the Promised One of Islām),  that the Qā’im would end the Muhammadan Dispensation and reveal a new Book and Revelation, that the Islamic ‘ulamā’ of His time would be mostly evil,  and the true knowledge of the Qur’ān would disappear,  that the world would oppose Him (and reign for only 7,  9  or 19 years),  that the Day of God will come suddenly and in a hidden way,  that the Qā’im would be followed by the Return of Jesus Christ afterwards,  that all Messengers of God who are ‘endowed with constancy’ [’ūlu l-‘aẓm] are pure Mirrors of God,  that they can be called Manifestations of God,  that they all manifest the Primal Will or Word of God,  that they are all the Mouthpieces of God,  that they are the Manifestations of the Beginning and the End—the Alpha and the Omega,  and that they are each the return of all previous Prophets,  that the Meeting with God or attainment unto the Presence of God means attainment unto the Presence of the Manifestation of God when He comes,  that the Manifestation of God brings true spiritual life,  and thus the resurrection and being ‘born again’,  and that the only Way to God is through recognising the Manifestation of God,  that the Qā’im or Mahdī or Twelfth Imām is Sayyid ‘Alī-Muhammad Shīrāzī—known as the Báb, and that the Return of Jesus Christ is Mīrzā Husayn-‘Alī Nūrī—known as Bahá’u’lláh, that Bahá’u’lláh is the Messenger of God for this day and age, that He is the Manifestation of God and Promised One of all religions,  that He is the One anticipated in the Bible and the Qur’ān whose coming is the Day of God, the Day of Judgment and the Resurrection, that He will abolish holy war,  and that true peace and happiness can only come from recognising Bahá’u’lláh and following His teachings. His religion will embrace all mankind; all people will eventually accept His Faith.  The Qur’ān and Islam are fulfilled through Bahá’u’lláh, and to be a true muslim (with a lower-case ‘m’), i.e. to submit to the Will of God, is to recognise Bahá’u’lláh. To be faithful to the Qur’ān and Islam, one must accept and believe in Bahá’u’lláh. 


To end this essay, we will look at some verses from the Qur’ān (about the coming of the Báb and Bahá’u’lláh) and some verses from Bahá’u’lláh—the Promised One of all religions:


‘Establish regular prayers – at the sun's decline till the darkness of the night [ghasiqa l-layl = an abjad value of 1260, i.e. until the year 1260 AH / 1844 AD], and the morning prayer and reading: for the prayer and reading in the morning carry their testimony’

– Qur’ān  17:78


‘He rules (all) affairs [al-’amr-a = an abjad value of 272, i.e. 272 lunar years from 610 AD to 260 AH] from the heavens to the earth: in the end will (all affairs) go up to Him, on a Day, the space whereof will be (as) a thousand years of your reckoning’  [i.e. from 260 AH, when the Affair, al-’amr, returned to God after the death of the 11th Imām, until the coming of the Qā’im in 1260 AH—a period of exactly 1,000 lunar years].

– Qur’ān 32:5


‘One day, the disturbing trumpet-blast [i.e. the coming of the Qā’im, the Báb] shall disturb it, which the second blast [i.e. the coming of Bahá’u’lláh] shall follow. Men's hearts on that day shall quake… Verily, it will be but a single blast’.  

– Qur’ān 79:6 – 8, 13 


‘Then it appeared good to them, even after they had seen the signs [al-’āyāt], to imprison [yasjununna-hu ‘secrete’, here meaning that the true Joseph would be hidden from Creation until revealed by God in 1863 AD]  him [the True Joseph, i.e. Bahá’u’lláh] until a time [ḥattā ḥīn-i = an abjad value of 68, i.e. 1268 AH / October 1851 – October 1852 AD]’.  

– Qur’ān 12:35


‘He [i.e. Bahá’u’lláh] is naught but a Remembrance for all the worlds [’in huwa ’illā dhikr-un li-l-‘ālamīna],  and ye shall surely know of His Announcement after a time [i.e. after the year 68, or 1268 AH / 1852 AD, when Bahá’u’lláh received His Revelation in Tehran] [wa la-ta‘lamunna naba’-a-hu ba‘da ḥīn-i] (my translation).  

– Qur’ān 38:87 – 88


‘When we sent two [i.e. Muhammad and the Báb] unto them and they charged them both with imposture - therefore with a third [i.e. Bahá’u’lláh] we strengthened them: and they said, "Verily we are the Sent unto you of God"’

– Qur’ān 36:14


‘And there shall be a blast on the trumpet [i.e. the Báb], and all who are in the Heavens and all who are in the Earth shall expire [fa-ṣaʿiqa ‘then they will die’, i.e. spiritual death until they recognised the Báb], save those whom God shall vouchsafe to live [i.e. the Bábís]. Then shall there be another blast on it [i.e. Bahá’u’lláh], and lo! arising they shall gaze around them’ [i.e. Bahá’u’lláh’s coming is a second Resurrection]. 

– Qur’ān 39:68


‘Concerning the Great Announcement [i.e. Bahá’u’lláh] [‘an-i n-naba’-i l-‘aẓīm-i]! …  Nay, they shall come to know [i.e. with the coming of the Báb] [kallā sa-ya‘lamūna]! Then again they shall come to know [i.e. with the coming of Bahá’u’lláh] [thumma sa-ya‘lamūna]! … On the day, the Spirit [i.e. Bahá’u’lláh]  and the angels will stand in rows—they will not speak, except whom the Compassionate permits, and he will say that which is correct/just  [yawm-a yaqūm-u r-rūḥ-u wa-l-malā’ika-t-u ṣaff-an lā yatakallamūna ’illā man ’adhina la-hu r-raḥmānu wa qāla ṣawāb-an]’  (my translation)

– Qur’ān 78:2, 5, 6, 38


‘And are they contemplating/observing until that God cometh [i.e. the coming of the Báb and Bahá’u’lláh] in the canopies of the clouds [fī ẓulal-in min-a l-ghamām-i] and the Angels, and the Cause/religion is ended/consummated [wa quḍiya l-’amr-u], and to God return all things/affairs/causes’ [i.e. all religious Dispensations come to an end]  (my  translation)

– Qur’ān 2:210


‘And thy Lord [i.e. Bahá’u’lláh] shall come with the Angels rank on rank [wa jā’a rabb-u-ka wa l-malak-u ṣaff-an ṣaff-an]’  (my translation)

– Qur’ān 89:22


Bahá’u’lláh writes, and His Word is the Word of God:


‘Furthermore, it is evident to thee that the Bearers of the trust of God are made manifest unto the peoples of the earth as the Exponents of a new Cause and the Bearers of a new Message. Inasmuch as these Birds of the Celestial Throne are all sent down from the heaven of the Will of God, and as they all arise to proclaim His irresistible Faith, they therefore are regarded as one soul and the same person. For they all drink from the one Cup of the love of God, and all partake of the fruit of the same Tree of Oneness. These Manifestations of God have each a twofold station. One is the station of pure abstraction and essential unity. In this respect, if thou callest them all by one name, and dost ascribe to them the same attribute, thou hast not erred from the truth. Even as He hath revealed: “No distinction do We make between any of His Messengers!”  For they one and all summon the people of the earth to acknowledge the Unity of God, and herald unto them the Kawthar of an infinite grace and bounty. They are all invested with the robe of Prophethood, and honoured with the mantle of glory. Thus hath Muḥammad, the Point of the Qur’án, revealed: “I am all the Prophets.”  …


‘It is clear and evident to thee that all the Prophets are the Temples of the Cause of God, Who have appeared clothed in divers attire. If thou wilt observe with discriminating eyes, thou wilt behold them all abiding in the same tabernacle, soaring in the same heaven, seated upon the same throne, uttering the same speech, and proclaiming the same Faith. Such is the unity of those Essences of being, those Luminaries of infinite and immeasurable splendour. Wherefore, should one of these Manifestations of Holiness proclaim saying: “I am the return of all the Prophets,” He verily speaketh the truth. In like manner, in every subsequent Revelation, the return of the former Revelation is a fact, the truth of which is firmly established. Inasmuch as the return of the Prophets of God, as attested by verses and traditions, hath been conclusively demonstrated, the return of their chosen ones also is therefore definitely proven. This return is too manifest in itself to require any evidence or proof. For instance, consider that among the Prophets was Noah. When He was invested with the robe of Prophethood, and was moved by the Spirit of God to arise and proclaim His Cause, whoever believed in Him and acknowledged His Faith, was endowed with the grace of a new life. Of him it could be truly said that he was reborn and revived, inasmuch as previous to his belief in God and his acceptance of His Manifestation, he had set his affections on the things of the world, such as attachment to earthly goods, to wife, children, food, drink, and the like, so much so that in the day-time and in the night season his one concern had been to amass riches and procure for himself the means of enjoyment and pleasure. Aside from these things, before his partaking of the reviving waters of faith, he had been so wedded to the traditions of his forefathers, and so passionately devoted to the observance of their customs and laws, that he would have preferred to suffer death rather than violate one letter of those superstitious forms and manners current amongst his people. Even as the people have cried: “Verily we found our fathers with a faith, and verily, in their footsteps we follow.”’  


‘Beware lest any name debar you from Him Who is the Possessor of all names, or any word shut you out from this Remembrance of God, this Source of Wisdom amongst you. Turn unto God and seek His protection, O concourse of divines, and make not of yourselves a veil between Me and My creatures. Thus doth your Lord admonish you, and command you to be just, lest your works should come to naught and ye yourselves be oblivious of your plight. Shall he who denieth this Cause be able to vindicate the truth of any cause throughout creation? Nay, by Him Who is the Fashioner of the universe! Yet the people are wrapped in a palpable veil. Say: Through this Cause the day-star of testimony hath dawned, and the luminary of proof hath shed its radiance upon all that dwell on earth. Fear God, O men of insight, and be not of those who disbelieve in Me. Take heed lest the word “Prophet” withhold you from this Most Great Announcement, or any reference to “Vicegerency” debar you from the sovereignty of Him Who is the Vicegerent of God, which overshadoweth all the worlds. Every name hath been created by His Word, and every cause is dependent on His irresistible, His mighty and wondrous Cause. Say: This is the Day of God, the Day on which naught shall be mentioned save His own Self, the omnipotent Protector of all worlds. This is the Cause that hath made all your superstitions and idols to tremble.

‘We, verily, see amongst you him who taketh hold of the Book of God and citeth from it proofs and arguments wherewith to repudiate his Lord, even as the followers of every other Faith sought reasons in their Holy Books for refuting Him Who is the Help in Peril, the Self-Subsisting. Say: God, the True One, is My witness that neither the Scriptures of the world, nor all the books and writings in existence, shall, in this Day, avail you aught without this, the Living Book, Who proclaimeth in the midmost heart of creation: “Verily, there is none other God but Me, the All-Knowing, the All-Wise.”

‘O concourse of divines! Beware lest ye be the cause of strife in the land, even as ye were the cause of the repudiation of the Faith in its early days. Gather the people around this Word that hath made the pebbles to cry out: “The Kingdom is God’s, the Dawning-place of all signs!” Thus doth your Lord admonish you, as a bounty on His part; He, of a truth, is the Ever-Forgiving, the Most Generous.’ 


‘VERILY I say, this is the Day in which mankind can behold the Face, and hear the Voice, of the Promised One. The Call of God hath been raised, and the light of His countenance hath been lifted up upon men. It behoveth every man to blot out the trace of every idle word from the tablet of his heart, and to gaze, with an open and unbiased mind, on the signs of His Revelation, the proofs of His Mission, and the tokens of His glory.


‘Great indeed is this Day! The allusions made to it in all the sacred Scriptures as the Day of God attest its greatness. The soul of every Prophet of God, of every Divine Messenger, hath thirsted for this wondrous Day. All the divers kindreds of the earth have, likewise, yearned to attain it. No sooner, however, had the Day Star of His Revelation manifested itself in the heaven of God’s Will, than all, except those whom the Almighty was pleased to guide, were found dumbfounded and heedless.’ 


‘By Him Who is the Great Announcement! The All-Merciful is come invested with undoubted sovereignty. The Balance hath been appointed, and all them that dwell on earth have been gathered together. The Trumpet hath been blown, and lo, all eyes have stared up with terror, and the hearts of all who are in the heavens and on the earth have trembled, except them whom the breath of the verses of God hath quickened, and who have detached themselves from all things.


‘This is the Day whereon the earth shall tell out her tidings. The workers of iniquity are her burdens, could ye but perceive it. The moon of idle fancy hath been cleft, and the heaven hath given out a palpable smoke. We see the people laid low, awed with the dread of thy Lord, the Almighty, the Most Powerful. The Crier hath cried out, and men have been torn away, so great hath been the fury of His wrath. The people of the left hand sigh and bemoan. The people of the right abide in noble habitations: they quaff the Wine that is life indeed, from the hands of the All-Merciful, and are, verily, the blissful.


‘The earth hath been shaken, and the mountains have passed away, and the angels have appeared, rank on rank, before Us. Most of the people are bewildered in their drunkenness and wear on their faces the evidences of anger. Thus have We gathered together the workers of iniquity. We see them rushing on towards their idol. Say: None shall be secure this Day from the decree of God. This indeed is a grievous Day. We point out to them those that led them astray. They see them, and yet recognize them not. Their eyes are drunken; they are indeed a blind people. Their proofs are the calumnies they uttered; condemned are their calumnies by God, the Help in Peril, the Self-Subsisting. The Evil One hath stirred up mischief in their hearts, and they are afflicted with a torment that none can avert. They hasten to the wicked, bearing the register of the workers of iniquity. Such are their doings.


‘Say: The heavens have been folded together, and the earth is held within His grasp, and the corrupt doers have been held by their forelock, and still they understand not. They drink of the tainted water, and know it not. Say: The shout hath been raised, and the people have come forth from their graves, and arising, are gazing around them. Some have made haste to attain the court of the God of Mercy, others have fallen down on their faces in the fire of Hell, while still others are lost in bewilderment. The verses of God have been revealed, and yet they have turned away from them. His proof hath been manifested, and yet they are unaware of it. And when they behold the face of the All-Merciful, their own faces are saddened, while they are disporting themselves. They hasten forward to Hell Fire, and mistake it for light. Far from God be what they fondly imagine! Say: Whether ye rejoice or whether ye burst for fury, the heavens are cleft asunder, and God hath come down, invested with radiant sovereignty. All created things are heard exclaiming: “The Kingdom is God’s, the Almighty, the All-Knowing, the All-Wise.”’ 


I understand that the above is a weighty message (qawl-an thaqīl-an),  but God’s message usually is. I hope, nevertheless, that I have adequately demonstrated to the reader the true meaning(s) of Seal of the Prophets, which does not mean that Muhammad (peace be upon Him) is the last Prophet, any more than He is the first Prophet, or all the Prophets. Likewise, I have, inshā’allāh, demonstrated that there is no finality in religion, because there is no finality in God’s Word and Revelation. Just as God is eternal and has neither beginning nor end, His creation has neither beginning nor end, because He is the Creator. Likewise, God’s way (His sunnah) never changes, so He will not change His method of guiding mankind. All of God’s attributes indicate permanent actions and qualities of God. Thus, even as God is Beauty, Light and Truth, He is also the Creator, the Sender of the Messengers, and the Lord of the Worlds.  Just as the Creator indicates that His creation has no beginning, nor any end, likewise His being the Sender means that He has always sent Messengers, sends Messengers, and will always send Messengers of God. There is no first Messenger of God, neither can there be a last Messenger of God. Even as there is an Adam, there is an Adam before Adam, and an Adam before that Adam. There is thus no First Prophet, even as there is no Last Prophet. Every Prophet is the First and the Last, the beginning and the end, the Alpha and the Omega, because each is the Mirror of that Primal Will that comes from God—His co-eternal Word (Logos, Kalimah). And as God is the Lord of the Worlds, His Revelation is not limited to Earth, this system, this galaxy, or even this known universe. Therefore, the idea that religion can ever end, or that there can be a ‘Last Day’ that is truly final, or a Final Judgement that ends all things, is illogical. For there will always be more planets, more worlds, more galaxies, more ‘universes’ where God’s Will and His Revelation continue. The Word of God, like the examples above from Bahá’u’lláh’s Writings, is the supreme Proof of the Messenger of God. Bahá’u’lláh is the supreme Manifestation of God and the Messenger of God for this Day and Age. If my essay has not proven this to you already, there is much more for you to read and study but, suffice it to say, the proofs of His Revelation are manifest and self-evident. As Bahá’u’lláh says:


‘Say: The first and foremost testimony establishing His truth is His own Self. Next to this testimony is His Revelation. For whoso faileth to recognize either the one or the other He hath established the words He hath revealed as proof of His reality and truth. This is, verily, an evidence of His tender mercy unto men. He hath endowed every soul with the capacity to recognize the signs of God. How could He, otherwise, have fulfilled His testimony unto men, if ye be of them that ponder His Cause in their hearts. He will never deal unjustly with any one, neither will He task a soul beyond its power. He, verily, is the Compassionate, the All-Merciful’.  


‘Know thou of a certainty that the Unseen can in no wise incarnate His Essence and reveal it unto men. He is, and hath ever been, immensely exalted beyond all that can either be recounted or perceived. From His retreat of glory His voice is ever proclaiming: “Verily, I am God; there is none other God besides Me, the All-Knowing, the All-Wise. I have manifested Myself unto men, and have sent down Him Who is the Day Spring of the signs of My Revelation. Through Him I have caused all creation to testify that there is none other God except Him, the Incomparable, the All-Informed, the All-Wise.” He Who is everlastingly hidden from the eyes of men can never be known except through His Manifestation, and His Manifestation can adduce no greater proof of the truth of His Mission than the proof of His own Person’. 


He is the Promised One! For more information on Bahá’u’lláh, see Bahaullah.org,  and read HM Balyuzi’s book, Bahá’u’lláh: The King of Glory.  Also, check out my short page on the life of Bahá’u’lláh here,  and for more information on the Bahá’í Faith, see Bahai.org and John Esslemont's book, Bahá’u’lláh and the New Era.  Also, check out my page, Nick’s Bahá’í FAQ).  You can find the Bahá’í Writings at the Bahá’í Reference Library.  I would also recommend watching the excellent free videos: Dawn of the Light,  about the life of the Báb, and Light to the World,  about the life of Bahá’u’lláh. Also, read my article on the “Meaning of the Return of Jesus Christ”,  which is closely related to this article and an essential companion to it.


Further religious articles that I’ve written, mainly on the topic of religion, Islam and the Qur’án, are below:


“The Meaning of the Return of Jesus Christ” (2025) 


“The Qur’ān’s Arguments for Belief in God” (2015) 


“A response to Stephen Fry’s condemnation of God” (2015)  


“Is Allāh the Arabic Word for God?” (2015) 


“5 Reasons the Qur’ān and US Constitution Can Coexist” (2015)  (A response to Steven Crowder’s blog post: ‘5 Reasons The Qur’an Can Never “Coexist” With the Constitution... Ever’.)


“A response to Ricky Gervais and his arguments about God and religion” (2017) 


“A Response to Jordan Peterson’s Comments on Islam” (2018) 


If you want to follow me on X, my account is @Nicholas19.  I also have another blog on Medium (https://nicholasbridgewater.medium.com/).  


Khodā Hāfez (May God be your Protector)! 


Abú-Jalál 


Go back to Part 2; go back to Part 1.


Bibliography


General 


The King James Bible (1611). Available online at: https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/ (accessed 4 January 2026)


Geneva Bible (1599). Available online at: http://www.genevabible.org/geneva.html (accessed 4 January 2026)


‘Abdu’l-Bahá (1912) The Promulgation of Universal Peace (Wilmette, Illinois: Bahá’í Publishing Trust). Available online at: https://www.bahai.org/library/authoritative-texts/abdul-baha/promulgation-universal-peace/ (accessed 10 February 2026)


Abdu’l-Bahá, Some Answered Questions (Wilmette, Illinois: Bahá’í Publishing Trust). Available online at: https://reference.bahai.org/en/t/ab/SAQ/index.html (accessed 10 January 2026)


Ayatollah Ibrahimi Amini (author), Dr. Sachedina al-Mahdi (translator) al-Imām al-Mahdī: The Just Leader of Humanity (Qum, Iran: Ansariyan Publications). Available online at: https://al-islam.org/al-imam-al-mahdi-just-leader-humanity-ibrahim-amini/chapter-14-signs-appearance-zuhur-mahdi ; https://al-islam.org/printpdf/book/export/html/13072 (accessed 8 February 2026) 


 حضرة بهاء الله, الفرائض والتعاليم الفردية - مدّة الدور البهائي (Duration of Bahá’í Dispensation). Available online at: https://oceanoflights.org/009-ord-duration-of-the-bahai-dispensation-ar/ (accessed 26 December 2025)


Bahá’u’lláh (author) Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh (Wilmette, Illinois: Bahá’í Publishing Trust). Available online at: https://reference.bahai.org/en/t/b/GWB/ (accessed 3 January 2026)


Bahá’u’lláh, The Kitáb-i-Aqdas (Most Holy Book) (Wilmette, Illinois: US Bahá’í Publishing Trust). Available online at: https://reference.bahai.org/en/t/b/KA/  (accessed 3 January 2025)


Bahá’u’lláh (author) The Kitáb-i-Íqán: The Book of Certitude (Wilmette, Illinois: Bahá’í Publishing Trust). Available online at: https://www.bahai.org/library/authoritative-texts/bahaullah/kitab-i-iqan/ (accessed 29 December 2025)


Bahá’u’lláh (author) Proclamation of Bahá’u’lláh (Wilmette, Illinois: US Bahá’í Publishing Trust). Available online at: https://reference.bahai.org/en/t/b/PB/index.html (accessed 10 January 2026)


Bahá’u’lláh (author) Tablets of Bahá’u’lláh Revealed After the Kitáb-i-Aqdas (Wilmette, Illinois: US Bahá’í Publishing Trust). Available online at: https://reference.bahai.org/en/t/b/TB/ (accessed 3 January 2026)


HM Balyuzi (1980) Bahá’u’lláh: The King of Glory (Oxford: George Ronald). Available online at: https://bahai-library.com/balyuzi_bahaullah_king_glory (accessed 3 January 2026) 


Abú-Rayhán Muhammad ibn Ahmad Al-Bírúní (author), Dr. C. Edward Sachau (translator) (1879) The Chronology of Ancient Nations, An English version of the Arabic Text of the Athâr-ul-Bâkiya of Albîrûnî, or “Vestiges of the Past,” collected and reduced to writing by the author in A.H. 390-1, A.D. 1000 (London: W.H. Allen & Co) 


John Calvin (1536), Henry Beveridge (translator) (1845) The Institutes of the Christian Religion (Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library), Chapter 9, p. 90. Available online at: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/c/calvin/institutes/cache/institutes.pdf (accessed 25 January 2026)


Shoghi Effendi (1953) Messages to the Bahá’í World: 1950–1957 (Wilmette, Illinois: US Bahá’í Publishing Trust) (1971 edition). Available online at: https://bahai-library.com/shoghi-effendi_messages_bahai_world (accessed 10 February 2026) 


Shoghi Effendi, The World Order of Bahá’u’lláh (Wilmette, Illinois: US Bahá’í Publishing Trust). Available online at: https://www.bahai.org/library/authoritative-texts/shoghi-effendi/world-order-bahaullah/ (accessed 10 February 2026)


John E. Esslemont (1923) Bahá’u’lláh and the New Era (London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd). Available online at: https://www.bahai.org/library/other-literature/publications-individual-authors/bahaullah-new-era/ (accessed 3 January 2026)


Flavius Josephus (author), William Whiston (translator) (1737) The Genuine Works of Flavius Josephus  the Jewish Historian Translated from the Original Greek (London), Antiquities of the Jews. Available online at: https://penelope.uchicago.edu/josephus/index.html (accessed 22 December 2025)


Denis Martin MacEoin (2009) The Messiah of Shiraz: Studies in Early and Middle Babism (London, Boston: Brill) 


Moojan Momen (2000) Islam and the Bahá’í Faith (Kidlington, Oxford: George Ronald) 


Muhammad Mustafa (author), Rowshan Mustafa (translator) (1993) Bahá’u’lláh: The Great Announcement of the Qur’an (Dhaka, Bangladesh: Bahá’í Publishing Trust). Available online at: https://bahai-library.com/mustafa_bahaullah_announcement_quran (accessed 1 January 2026)


R.H. Charles Oxford (1913) The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament in English (Oxford: The Clarendon Press). Available online at: https://www.ccel.org/c/charles/otpseudepig/enoch/ENOCH_2.HTM ; https://archive.org/details/apocryphapseudep02charuoft/page/i/mode/1up (accessed 1 January 2026) 


William Sears (1961) Thief in the Night: The Case of the Missing Millennium (Oxford: George Ronald). Available online at: https://bahai-library.com/pdf/s/sears_thief_night.pdf (accessed 29 December 2025) 


Gook K.S. Shavakshal (1976) Zoroastrianism: The Parsi Faith, p. 148. Available online at: https://www.tparents.org/Library/Unification/Books/WorldRel1/WorldRel1-2.pdf (accessed 29 December 2025)


Abu Ja'far Muhammad Bin Jarir At-Tabari (author), Ismail K. Poonawala (translator) (1990) The History of al-Tabari, Volume IX: The Last Years of the Prophet (Albany, New York: State University of New York Press)


Najmuddin Tabasi (author), Mansoor L. Limba (translator) (2003) An Overview of the Mahdi’s (‘atfs) Government, “The Government of Truth” (Ahlul Bayt World Assembly), Al-Islam.org. Available online at: https://al-islam.org/overview-mahdis-atfs-government-najmuddin-tabasi/government-truth (accessed 3 January 2026) 


Martin Litchfield West (2010) The Hymns of Zoroaster: A New Translation of the Most Ancient Sacred Texts of Iran (I.B.Tauris) 


Articles


NJ Bridgewater (2002) “Nick’s Frequently Asked Questions About the Bahá’í Faith”. Available online at: https://web.archive.org/web/20251102090959/https://klausjames.tripod.com/bahai.html (accessed 3 January 2026)


NJ Bridgewater (2004) “Nick’s Frequently Asked Questions about the Bahá’í Faith (Part Three): Founders of the Divine Religions”, BAHÁ’U’LLÁH. Available online at: https://web.archive.org/web/20230605102402/https://klausjames.tripod.com/bahai3bahaullah.html (accessed 3 January 2026) 


NJ Bridgewater (2009) “Arabic Influence on Persian: The extent to which the Persian language has been influenced by the Arabic language”, BA Dissertation (University of Manchester), 15 May 2009


NJ Bridgewater (2015) “Is Allah the Arabic Word for God?” Crossing the Bridge, 20 December 2015. Available online at: https://nicholasjames19.blogspot.com/2015/12/is-allah-arabic-word-for-god.html (accessed 25 December 2025)


NJ Bridgewater (2025) “The Meaning of the Return of Jesus Christ”, Crossing the Bridge, 20 December 2025. Available online at: https://nicholasjames19.blogspot.com/2025/12/the-meaning-of-return-of-jesus-christ.html (accessed 22 December 2025) 


Christopher Eames (2022) “967 B.C.E.: How the Lynchpin Date for Solomon’s Temple Was Determined”, Armstrong Institute of Biblical Archaeology, 23 April 2022.  Available online at: https://armstronginstitute.org/685-967-bce-how-the-lynchpin-date-for-solomons-temple-was-determined#:~:text=Beyond%20that%2C%20Coucke%20noted%20the,1%20Kings%206:1 (accessed 30 December 2025)


Farhan Iqbal (2025) “Meanings of the word Khatam from Arabic dictionaries”, Al-Islam.org. Available online at: https://www.alislam.org/articles/meanings-of-word-khatam-from-arabic-dictionaries/ (accessed 28 December 2025) 


Tafsir Ibn Katheer in English”. Available online at:  https://surahquran.com/tafsir-english-aya-40-sora-33.html (accessed 28 December 2025) 


Stephen Lambden (2006) “TB Lawh-i-zuhur Introductory Notes”, Hurqalya Publications: Center for Shaykhī and Bābī-Bahā’ī Studies, UC Merced, last partially revised 27th March 2015 + 10-12-2022 (accessed 26 December 2025) 


“Maimonides’ Thirteen Principles of the Faith”, translated by David R. Blumenthal. Available online at: http://davidblumenthal.org/Maimonides'%20Principles%20(DRB)%20.pdf (accessed 22 December 2025) 


Natasha Pajda (2011/12) “The Essenes at Qumran: The Concept of a Suffering Messiah” (Research Paper). Available online at: https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/sites.stedwards.edu/dist/9/186/files/2011/12/qumran-messiah-research-paper.pdf (accessed 22 December 2025)


Vahid Rafati (1979) The Development of Shaykhī Thought in Shī‘ī Islam, A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Islamic Studies (University of California, Los Angeles, 1979), p. 169. Available online at: https://bahai-library.com/pdf/r/rafati_development_shaykhi_thought.pdf (accessed 31 December 2025) 


A. Shapur Shahbazi (1977) ‘The 'Traditional Date of Zoroaster' Explained’ (Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, 1977, Vol. 40, No. 1 (1977), pp. 25-35) 


Ismael Velasco (2020) “Reflections on Baha'u'llah's Claims to Being the Return of Imam Husayn”, 2020-06, Bahá’í Library Online (work in progress). Available online at: https://bahai-library.com/velasco_bahaullah_return_husayn (accessed 3 January 2026) 


Brian Windle (2022) “Top Ten Discoveries Related to Moses and the Exodus”, Associates for Biblical Research, 29 July 2022.  Available online at: https://biblearchaeology.org/research/chronological-categories/exodus-era/4919-top-ten-discoveries-related-to-moses-and-the-exod (accessed 30 December 2025) 


Qur’ān Translations


Abdullah Yusuf Ali (translator) (1934, reprinted 2010) The Holy Qur’an: Translation & Commentary (Birmingham, England: IPCI: Islamic Vision). Available online at: https://sacred-texts.com/isl/yaq/index.htm (accessed 10 January 2026)


Edward Henry Palmer (translator) (1880) The Qur'ân (Oxford: Clarendon Press). Available online at: https://sacred-texts.com/isl/sbe06/index.htm (accessed 10 January 2026)


Mohammed Marmaduke Pickthall (translator) (1938) The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (Hyderabad-Deccan: Government Central Press). Available online at: https://sacred-texts.com/isl/pick/index.htm (accessed 10 January 2026)


J.M. Rodwell (translator) (1876) Available online at:  https://sacred-texts.com/isl/qr/index.htm (accessed 10 January 2026)


Sale Available online at:


Hadith Sources / References


‘Aqd ad-Durar, p. 239


‘Ayyashi, Tafsir ‘Ayyashi, vol. 2, p. 326


Muhammad-Bāqir al-Majlisī, Biḥār-u l-’Anwār, vol. 25, p. 16; vol. 108, p. 253; vol. 52, p. 363; vol. 52, p. 354; chapter 5; vol. 52, p. 298; vol. 51, p. 1


Dala’il al-Imamah, p. 233


Ad-Durr al-Manthūr, vol. 5, p. 204


Imam Ahmad, At-Tabarani, Ibn Hibban, Al-Haakim, Al-Albany


Firdaws al-Akhbar, vol. 4, p. 6


Jāmi‘ al-Bayān, vol. 6, p. 183


Jami`at-Tirmidhi 3730, Book 49, Hadith 127; 2202; Vol. 1, Book 46, Hadith 3731; Vol. 1, Book 46, Hadith 3788


Al-Ghaybah by al-Nu‘mani, p. 331


Kashf al-Ghummah, vol. 3, p. 271


Ibn Batriq, ‘Umdah, p. 439


Ibn Tawus, Malahim, p. 142


Ikhtisas, p. 257


Ithbat al-hudat, Vol. 7, p. 83; p. 110,


al-Mu‘jam al-Kabir by al-Tabarani, vol. 8, p. 101


Ar-Rāzī, At-Tafsīr al-Kabīr, vol. 25, p. 214


Riyad as-Salihin 655


Sahih al-Bukhari 3455, Book 60, Hadith 122; Vol. 1, No. 668, Book of Prophets, p. 490


Sahih Muslim 1822a; 1821d; 1821e


Sunan Abī Dāwūd 4284


Sunan Abī Dāwūd 4285


Sunan Ibn Majah 4039; 4048; 4083


Sunan an-Nasa’i 2874


Al-Ghaybah by al-Tusi, p. 479


Az-Zamakhsharī, al-Kashshāf, vol. 2, p. 433


Yanabi‘ al-Mawaddah, p. 432


Wikipedia / Reference Works


Anno Mundi (Wikipedia article). Available online at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anno_Mundi (accessed 30 December 2025)


The Bahá’í Faith: The Official Website of the Worldwide Bahá’í Community”. Available online at: https://www.bahai.org/ (accessed 3 January 2026) 


“Bible Timeline”, Bible Hub. Available online at: https://biblehub.com/timeline/old.htm (accessed 30 December 2025)


“The Biblical Timeline”. Available online at: https://www.thebiblicaltimeline.org/articles-videos/before-abraham/ (accessed 31 December 2025)


“The Chronological Debate From Adam to Abraham: In Defense of the Masoretic Text”, Armstrong Institute of Biblical Chronology, 27 June 2023. Available online at: https://armstronginstitute.org/853-the-chronological-debate-from-adam-to-abraham-in-defense-of-the-masoretic-text (accessed 30 December 2025)


“Code: 105, Subject: Existence, attributes, and actions of the Mahdi”, ‘Question & Answer’, The website of Mansoor Hashemi Khorasani. Available online at: https://www.alkhorasani.com/en/q-a/3253/ (accessed 3 January 2026) 


Daena (Wikipedia article). Available online at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daena (accessed 26 December 2025)


“Estimating Joseph’s Timeline”. Available online at: https://ready4eternity.com/estimating-josephs-timeline/ (accessed 31 December 2025)


“Good question... ...Was Terah 70 or 130 when Abraham was born?”, A Christian Think Tank, updated Nov/2005. Available online at: https://www.christian-thinktank.com/abebirth.html (accessed 31 December 2025)


History of Sumer (Wikipedia article). Available online at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Sumer (accessed 8 February 2026).


Homoousion (Wikipedia article). Available online at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homoousion (accessed 25 January 2026)


Edward William Lane, Stanley Lane-Poole (1863) An Arabic-English Lexicon (London: Williams and Norgate)


Muhammad’s first revelation (Wikipedia article). Available online at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad%27s_first_revelation (accessed 26 December 2025)


Seven Laws of Noah (Wikipedia article). Available online at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah (accessed 8 February 2026)


Quranic Arabic Corpus, Quran Dictionary, ‘s-l-m’. Available online at: https://corpus.quran.com/qurandictionary.jsp?q=slm (accessed 25 December 2025)


Rev. James Ussher (1658) The Annals of the World deduced from The Origin of Time, and continued to the beginning of the Emperor Vespasians Reign, and the total Destruction and Abolition of the Temple and Common-wealth of the Jews (London: E. Tyler). See: https://www.swartzentrover.com/cotor/e-books/christ/ussher/ussher_age3.htm (accessed 26 December 2025) 


Ussher chronology (Wikipedia article). Available online at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ussher_chronology (accessed 30 December 2025)


Hans Wehr, J. Milton Cowan (1979) A Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic (4th edition, Harrosowitz)


Friday, 25 February 2011

Free Audiobook Version of A Year Amongst the Persians Now Available!

Edward Granville Browne (1862 - 1926) in Persian dress

A group recording of A year amongst the Persians; impressions as to the life, character, and thought of the people of Persia, received during twelve month's residence in that country in the years 1887-8 has now been completed! The whole length of the audiobook is 29 hours, 8 seconds and is divided into 46 sections. I was the Book Coordinator (BC) for this project. Leni was the Meta Coordinator (MC). The book was read by four readers: myself, antinomy, hefyd and Nasseem. The dedicated proof listener was mim@can. The book may be downloaded from this site:

http://librivox.org/a-year-amongst-the-persians-by-edward-granville-brown/

It can also be listened to directly at the Internet Archive page:

http://www.archive.org/details/year_amongst_persians_1102_librivox

Edward Granville Browne (1862 – 1926), born in Stouts Hill, Uley, Gloucestershire, England, was a British orientalist who published numerous articles and books of academic value, mainly in the areas of history and literature. His works are respected for their scholarship, uniqueness, and style. He published in areas which few other Western scholars had explored to any sufficient degree. He used a language and style that showed high respect for everybody, even toward those whom he personally did not view in positive light.

Map of Persia, from "the Dawn-Breakers" (originally published in 1932)

In A Year Amongst the Persians (1893) he wrote a sympathetic portrayal of a Persian society which few Westerners had ever seen, including a frank account of the effects of opium. It did not attract the attention it deserved at the time of its initial publication, but after his death in 1926 it was reprinted and became a classic in English travel literature. A Year Amongst the Persians includes moving accounts of the Bahá’í community in Iran. Concerning his meetings with the Bahá’ís of Iran, Browne writes: “The memory of those assemblies can never fade from my mind; the recollection of those faces and those tones no time can efface. I have gazed with awe on the workings of a mighty Spirit, and I marvel whereunto it tends”. The work contains many conversations between Browne and Bahá’ís, in which they demonstrate the proofs of their Faith through rational arguments. Browne didn't always agree with this arguments, but that may be because he didn't understand them fully.


Bahá’ís laying the foundation stone for the Bahá’í Temple in Ashkabad, Turkmenistan







The following is part of one of Browne's conversations with the Bahá’ís of Shiraz (pp. 336 - 340):

"I have already said that what is incumbent on every man is that he should believe in the 'manifestation' of his own age. It is not required of him that he should discuss and compare all previous 'manifestations.' You have been brought up a follower of Christ. We have believed in this 'manifestation' which has taken place in these days. Let us not waste time in disputing about intermediate 'manifestations.' We do not desire to make you believe in Muhammad but in Behá. If you should be convinced of the truth of Behá's teaching you have passed over the stage of Islám altogether. The last 'manifestation' includes and
sums up all preceding ones. You say that you could not accept Islám because its laws and ordinances are harsher, and, in your eyes, less perfect than those laid down by Christ. Very well, we do not ask you to accept Islám; we ask you to consider whether you should not accept Behá. To do so you need not go back from a gentle to a severe dispensation. Behá has come for the perfecting of the law of Christ, and his injunctions are in all respects similar; for instance, we are commanded to prefer rather that we should be killed than that we should kill. It is the same throughout, and, indeed, could not be otherwise, for Behá is Christ returned again, even as He promised, to perfect that which He had begun. Your own books tell you that Christ shall come 'like a thief in the night,' at a time when you are not expecting Him."



"True," I [Browne] replied, "but those same books tell us also that His coming shall be 'as the lightning, that lighteneth out of the one part under heaven and shineth unto the other part under heaven.'"


"There can be no contradiction between these two similes," answered the Bábí [Bahá’í]; "and since the phrase 'like a thief in the night' evidently signifies that when Christ returns it will be in a place where you do not expect Him, and at a time when you do not expect Him--that is, suddenly and secretly--it is clear that the comparison in the other passage which you quoted is to the suddenness and swiftness of the lightning, not to its universal vividness. If, as the Christians for the most-part expect, Christ should come riding upon the clouds surrounded by angels, how could He be said in any sense to come 'like a thief in the night'? Everyone would see him, and, seeing, would be compelled to believe. It has always been through such considerations as these that men have rejected the prophet whose advent they professed to be expecting, because He did not come in some unnatural and impossible manner which they had vainly imagined. Christ was indeed the promised Messiah, yet the Jews, who had waited, and prayed, and longed for the coming of the Messiah,rejected Him when He did come for just such reasons. Ask a Jew now why he does not believe in Christ, and he will tell you that the signs whereby the Messiah was to be known were not manifest at His coming. Yet, had he understood what was intended by those signs, instead of being led away by vain traditions, he would know that the promised Messiah had come and gone and come again. So with the Christians. On a mountain close by Acre [Mount Carmel] is a monastery peopled by Christian priests and monks, assembled there to await the arrival of Christ on that spot as foretold. And they continue to gaze upwards into heaven, whence they suppose that He will descend, while only a few miles off in Acre He has returned, and is dwelling amongst men as before.

Mount Carmel as it looked in 1894, before the establishment of the Bahá’í World Centre on the Mountain


"O be not blinded by those very misapprehensions which you condemn so strongly in the Jews! The Jews would not believe in Christ because He was not accompanied by a host of angels; you blame the Jews for their obstinacy and frowardness, and you do rightly. But beware lest you condemn yourselves by alleging the very same reason as an excuse for rejecting this 'manifestation.' Christ came to the Jews accompanied by angels--angels none the less because they were in the guise of fishermen. Christ returns to you as Behá with angels, with clouds, with the sound of trumpets. His angels are His messengers; the clouds are the doubts which prevent you from recognising Him; the sound of trumpets is the sound of the proclamation which you now hear, announcing that He has come once more from heaven, even as He came before, not as a human form descending visibly from the sky, but as the Spirit of God entering into a man, and abiding there."

"Well," I replied, "your arguments are strong, and certainly deserve consideration. But, even supposing that you are right in principle, it does not follow that they hold good in this particular case. If I grant that the return of Christ may be in such wise as you indicate, nevertheless mere assertion will notprove that Behá is Christ. Indeed, we are told by Christ Himself that many will arise in His name, saying, 'See here,' or 'See there,' and are warned not to follow them."

"Many have arisen falsely claiming to be Christ," he answered, "but the injunction laid on you to beware of these does not mean that you are to refuse to accept Christ when He does return. The very fact that there are pretenders is a proof that there is a reality. You demand proofs, and you are right to do so. What proofs would suffice for you?"

"The chief proofs which occur to me at this moment," I replied, "are as follows:--You admit, so far as I understand, that in each 'manifestation' a promise has been given of a succeeding 'manifestation,' and that certain signs have always been laid down whereby that 'manifestation' may be recognised. It is therefore incumbent on you to show that the signs foretold by Christ as heralding His return have been accomplished in the coming of Behá. Furthermore, since each 'manifestation' must be fuller, completer, and more perfect than the last, you must prove that the doctrines taught by Behá are superior to the teaching of Christ--a thing which I confess seems to me almost impossible, for I cannot imagine a doctrine purer or more elevated than that of Christ. Lastly, quite apart from miracles in the ordinary sense, there is one sign which we regard as the especial characteristic of a prophet, to wit, that he should have knowledge of events which have not yet come to pass. No sign can be more appropriate or more convincing than this. For a prophet claims to be inspired by God, and to speak of the mysteries of the Unseen. If he has knowledge of the Unseen he may well be expected to have knowledge of the Future. That we may know that what he tells us about other matters beyond our ken is true, we must be convinced that he has knowledge surpassing ours in some matter which we can verify. This is afforded most readily by the foretelling of events which have not yet happened, and which we cannot foresee. These three signs appear to me both sufficient and requisite to establish such a claim as that which you advance for Behá."

"As regards knowledge of the future," replied Haji Mirza Hasan, "I could tell you of many occasions on which Behá has given proof of such. Not only I myself, but almost all who have been at Acre, and stood in his presence, have received warnings of impending dangers, or information concerning forthcoming events. Some of these I will, if it please God, relate to you at some future time. As regards the superiority of Behá's doctrines to those of Christ, you can judge for yourself if you will read his words. As regards the news of this 'manifestation' given to you by Christ, is it not the case that He promised to return? Did He not declare that one should come to comfort His followers, and perfect what He had begun? Did He not signify that after the Son should come the Father?"

Such conversations were typical of Browne's encounters with Bahá’ís. All of Browne's objections have been answered and fully explained in numerous works of Bahá’í literature. The proofs that Browne seeks have been provided in many works, such as the numerous writings of 'Abdu'l-Bahá, the Báb's Seven Proofs, Bahá'u'lláh's Kitáb-i-Íqán and Gems of Divine Mysteries, The Brilliant Proof by Mírzá Abu’l-Fadl-i-Gulpáygání, Christ and Bahá'u'lláh by George Townsend, The Prophecies of Jesus by Michael W. Sours, Understanding Christian Beliefs by Michael W. Sours, Understanding Biblical Evidence by Michael W. Sours, Thief in the Night: The Case of the Missing Millennium by William Sears, The Proofs of Bahá'u'lláh's Mission, The Challenge of Bahá'u'lláh by Gary L. Matthews, He Cometh With Clouds by Gary L. Matthews, Preparing for Christ's New Name by Alex Gottdank, Promises Fulfilled: Christianity, Islam and the Baha'i Faith by Nabil I. Hanna, among many, many others in English, Arabic, Persian and other languages.

Edward G. Browne referred to Bahá’ís as Bábís, but this was a mistake on his part. Siyyid ‘Alí-Muhammad-i-Shírází (1819-1850), known as the “Báb”, which is Arabic for “Gate”, proclaimed that He was the Promised One of Islám. He declared His mission in 1844 and was executed by the Persian government in 1850. His followers were known as Bábís. The Báb also proclaimed that He was the Gate, Herald and Forerunner of an even greater Manifestation of God who would come after Him, the Promised One of all religions and Return of Christ in the Glory of the Father.

In 1863, Mírzá Husyan-‘Alí-yi-Núrí (1817-1892), known as Bahá’u’lláh (Arabic for “The Glory of God”), proclaimed that He was the Promised One foretold by the Báb. By the time Browne arrived in Iran, most Bábís had already accepted Bahá’u’lláh as the Promised One and were now known as Bahá’ís. A small group of Bábís, led by Mírzá Yahyá Núrí, known as Azal, who was Bahá’u’lláh’s younger half-brother, rejected these claims. Azal is notorious for poisoning his own Brother (i.e. Bahá’u’lláh) as well as trying to assassinate other enemies on numerous occasions. While the Báb had made Azal His nominal successor, this was only until the Promised One were to appear, upon which time Azal’s authority was supposed to cease. Most Bábís realised Azal’s depravity and turned to Bahá’u’lláh, whose character and spirituality were unsurpassed. Browne was sympathetic to Azal’s claims but was also impressed by the spirituality of the Bahá’í community. The followers of Azal (sometimes spelled Ezel) were known as Azalís.

In 1890, Browne journeyed to Cyprus (where he met Azal) and then onto 'Akká (Acre) in Palestine, where he met both 'Abdu'l-Bahá and Bahá'u'lláh. He later recorded this journey in the Introduction to A Traveller's Narrative. I have previously posted about the audio version of A Traveller's Narrative, which doesn't include the introduction. I have now recorded the introduction as part of the Short Nonfiction Collection Vol. 020. In the Introduction (p. xxxvi.), Browne described 'Abdu'l-Bahá as “a tall strongly-built man holding himself straight as an arrow, with white turban and raiment, long black locks reaching almost to the shoulder, broad powerful forehead indicating a strong intellect combined with an unswerving will, eyes keen as a hawk's, and strongly-marked but pleasing features… One more eloquent of speech, more ready of argument, more apt of illustration, more intimately acquainted with the sacred books of the Jews, the Christians, and the Muhammadans, could, I should think, scarcely be found even amongst the eloquent, ready, and subtle race to which he belongs”.

'Abdu'l-Bahá, "The Master"
 
He described his meeting with Bahá'u'lláh in the following words (pp. xxxix. - xli.):

"Of the culminating event of this my journey some few words at least must be said. During the morning of the day after my installation at Behjé one of Behá's younger sons entered the room where I was sitting and beckoned to me to follow him. I did so, and was conducted through passages and rooms at which I scarcely had time to glance to a spacious hall, paved, so far as I remember (for my mind was occupied with other thoughts) with a mosaic of marble. Before a curtain suspended from the wall of this great ante-chamber my conductor paused for a moment while I removed my shoes. Then, with a quick movement of the hand, he withdrew, and, as I passed, replaced the curtain; and I found myself in a large apartment, along the upper end of which ran a low divan, while on the side opposite to the door were placed two or three chairs. Though I dimly suspected whither I was going and whom I was to behold (for no distinct intimation had been given to me), a second or two lapsed ere, with a throb of wonder and awe, I became definitely conscious that the room was not untenanted. In the corner where the divan met the wall sat a wondrous and venerable figure, crowned with a felt head-dress of the kind called táj by dervishes (but of unusual height and make), round the base of which was wound a small white turban. The face of him on whom I gazed I can never forget, though I cannot describe it. Those piercing eyes seemed to read one's very soul; power and authority sat on that ample brow; while the deep lines on the forehead and face implied an age which the jet-black hair and beard flowing down in indistinguishable luxuriance almost to the waist seemed to belie. No need to ask in whose presence I stood, as I bowed myself before one who is the object of a devotion and love which kings might envy and emperors sigh for in vain!

The Room where E.G. Browne met Bahá'u'lláh


"A mild dignified voice bade me be seated, and then continued:- "Praise be to God that thou hast attained!... Thou hast come to see a prisoner and an exile.... We desire but the good of the world and the happiness of the nations; yet they deem us a stirrer up of strife and sedition worthy of bondage and banishment.... That all nations should become one in faith and all men as brothers; that the bonds of affection and unity between the sons of men should be strengthened; that diversity of religion should cease, and differences of race be annulled - what harm is there in this?... Yet so it shall be; these fruitless strifes, these ruinous wars shall pass away, and the 'Most Great Peace' shall come.... Do not you in Europe need this also? Is not this that which Christ foretold?... Yet do we see your kings and rulers lavishing their treasures more freely on means for the destruction of the human race than on that which would conduce to the happiness of mankind.... These strifes and this bloodshed and discord must cease, and all men be as one kindred and one family.... Let not a man glory in this, that he loves his country; let him rather glory in this, that he loves his kind...."

"Such, so far as I can recall them, were the words which, besides many others, I heard from Behá. Let those who read them consider well with themselves whether such doctrines merit death and bonds, and whether the world is more likely to gain or lose by their diffusion.

"My interview lasted altogether about twenty minutes, and during the latter part of it Behá read a portion of that epistle (lawh) whereof the translation occupies the last paragraph on p. 70 and the greater part of p. 71 of this book."

This pen-portrait is famous among Bahá’ís and remains one of his lasting legacies to the community which he studied for so long. While Browne’s sympathetic views on Azal were misguided, he made a great contribution to Bahá’í studies through his translations of historical works and his accounts of the Bahá’í community. Amongst Persians, at a time when nearly the whole nation was highly suspicious of foreigners, and in particular of any British or Russian person due to the political dynamics of that time, Edward Browne was well accepted by the people who knew him and his works. He is well remembered today, and a street named after him in Tehran, as well as his statue, remained even after the Iranian revolution in 1979.


LibriVox is a tremendous way of producing public domain, freely accessible Bahá'í literature. One needs only find a public domain Bahá'í text (and there are many at Internet Archive, Google Books, H-Net, etc.), create an account at the LibriVox forum, read the Newbie Guide to Recording, submit a 1-minute test  (to check one's settings are correct) and then one can begin to bring the world of Bahá'í literature to life in an audio format, so that the waiting masses of humanity can hear and appreciate the Word of God and the Divine Teachings. This is a great service to the Faith, that any Bahá'í can do.








If you like this recording, you will also like my recordings of:

Talks by Abdul-Baha Given in Paris by ‘Abdu’l-Bahá
A Traveller's Narrative Written to Illustrate the Episode of the Báb by ‘Abdu’l-Bahá
The Myserious Forces of Civilization by ‘Abdu’l-Bahá
Introduction to A Traveller's Narrative Written to Illustrate the Episode of the Báb by E. G. Browne (Sections 7 and 8 of the Short Nonfiction Collection Vol. 020)
The Bahai Revelation by Thornton Chase
In Galilee by Thornton Chase
The Universal Religion: Bahaism - Its Rise and Social Import by Hippolyte Dreyfus-Barney
The Brilliant Proof (Burhäne Lämé) in reply to an attack upon the Bahai Revelation by Peter Z. Easton by Mírzá Abu’l-Fadl-i-Gulpáygání
The Revelation of Baha-ullah in a Sequence of Four Lessons by Isabella D. Brittingham
Persian Self-Taught (in Roman Characters) with English Phonetic Pronunciation by Shaykh Hasan

For more Bahá'í recordings which I have completed, see: My Audiobooks